22,000,000 pounds unspecified sense

William H. Ukers (author)

• coffee exports were 22,000,000 pounds 1810
  assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500

  to more than 22,000,000 pounds in 1810

  judge verdicts (2)

  • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'Exports amounted to 10,845,000 pounds in 1803; and to more than 22,000,000 pounds in 1810.' The subject (coffee), predicate (exports were), object (22,000,000 pounds), and time (1810) are all explicitly mentioned with no rewording needed.
  • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as factual statement without attribution to a named source). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage states this as fact. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's neutral reporting tone. The time qualifiers correctly specify 1810 with matching valid_from and valid_to dates. The context is appropriately empty as the passage does not restrict this claim to a particular sense or role. The quote 'to more than 22,000,000 pounds in 1810' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.
• coffee exports recorded at 22,000,000 pounds 1804 ⟨Jamaica⟩
  assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500

  in 1804, exports of 22,000,000 pounds are recorded

  judge verdicts (2)

  • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'At the beginning of the new century, in 1804, exports of 22,000,000 pounds are recorded.' All details match exactly with no rewording needed.
  • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (implicit in the passage's factual statement rather than attributed to a named source). The stance 'asserts' is appropriate for the passage's straightforward declarative statement. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's objective reporting. The time qualifiers (when: 1804, valid_from: 1804, valid_to: 1804) match the passage's temporal reference exactly. The context 'Jamaica' correctly restricts the claim to the appropriate geographic scope. The quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim.