William H. Ukers (author)
Bahias and Victorias were sold as Rios
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage, which explicitly states 'Bahias and Victorias were sold as Rios' as part of the rebagging practices that obtained for years in New York with Central American growths.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to 'author' as the passage presents this as direct historical narration without attribution to a named source. The stance 'asserts' matches the declarative framing. The sentiment is appropriately neutral. The time qualifier 'for years' matches the passage's opening phrase 'For years a practise obtained.' The context 'Central American coffee in New York' correctly reflects the passage's scope. The quote 'Bahias and Victorias were sold as Rios' appears verbatim and directly supports the claim that Bahias were sold as Rios.