beauty unspecified sense

concept · 2 mentions

that which is concealed and discovered in Teaism

Connections

The concepts, people, and places this entity is most linked to by claims — node size is mention count, colour is type, dashed nodes are other senses of the same word.

ConceptPerson

Defining properties

are beautiful coffee flowers
has always something to offer master
has no right to approach one

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

Kakuzo Okakura (author)

master has always something to offer beauty
assertspositivesource: okakura-book-of-tea
A master has always something to offer
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage's final sentence: 'A master has always something to offer.' The passage explicitly asserts this as the author's position, supporting the claim with full groundedness.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as the author's assertion, not attributed to a named source). The stance is 'asserts' (not disputed or questioned). The sentiment is positive, reflecting the passage's reverent tone toward masters. The time qualifiers are appropriately null since the passage provides no specific temporal scope. The context is empty as the passage does not restrict the claim to a particular sense or role. The quote 'A master has always something to offer' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.

planter

coffee flowers are beautiful beauty
assertspositivesource: coffee-pg28500
The flowers are beautiful
judge verdicts (4)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the opening sentence of the passage: 'The flowers are beautiful' explicitly asserts that coffee flowers possess beauty, and 'beauty and fragrance' are both mentioned as qualities the planter perceives in them.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.60 fail — The viewpoint qualifier is unfaithful. The passage attributes the observation to 'the planter' (the passage states 'the eye of the planter sees in them'), not to the 'author'. The claim should use viewpoint: 'planter' instead of 'author'. Additionally, the quote provided does not fully support the predicate as stated - the passage says flowers 'are beautiful' but then qualifies that the planter sees 'not alone beauty and fragrance' (emphasizing the planter's utilitarian perspective beyond mere aesthetics), which complicates the straightforward positive assertion in the claim.
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage's opening sentence: 'The flowers are beautiful.' This is a straightforward statement that exactly matches the subject-predicate-object structure of the claim.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The quote is verbatim, viewpoint is correct (the passage frames this from the planter's perspective), stance is 'asserts' as appropriate, sentiment is positive matching the passage's connotation, and time qualifiers are correctly set to null since no temporal scope is given. Minor deduction: the context field is empty, but the passage does implicitly contextualize these as 'coffee flowers' (from the coffee plant), so while not strictly wrong to leave empty, it could have been specified as such for complete fidelity.

tea-masters

one has no right to approach beauty
assertsneutralsource: okakura-book-of-tea
until one has made himself beautiful he has no right to approach beauty
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage as a direct quote: 'until one has made himself beautiful he has no right to approach beauty.' This sentence appears verbatim in the text describing the tea-masters' philosophy.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the tea-masters (their philosophy is being described). The stance is 'asserts' which is appropriate as the passage presents this as the tea-masters' conviction, not a dispute. The sentiment is neutral, matching the prescriptive tone of the passage. The time qualifiers are all null, which is correct as the passage provides no specific temporal markers. The context is empty, which is appropriate as the passage does not restrict this statement to a particular sense or role. The quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim about the requirement to make oneself beautiful before approaching beauty.