Chinese herbal unspecified sense

Robert O. Fielding (author)

• cassia mentioned in Chinese herbal 1700 B.C. ⟨under the name kwei⟩
  assertsneutralsource: spices-pg60192

  It is mentioned in a Chinese herbal published in 1700 B. C. under the name kwei

  judge verdicts (2)

  • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'It is mentioned in a Chinese herbal published in 1700 B. C. under the name kwei.' The subject (cassia), predicate (mentioned in), object (Chinese herbal), time (1700 B.C.), and context (under the name kwei) are all explicitly supported by the text.
  • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as its own assertion). The stance of 'asserts' matches the passage's confident presentation. The sentiment is neutral, appropriate for a factual historical claim. The time qualifier correctly reflects '1700 B.C.' as stated in the passage with proper normalization to '-1700'. The context 'under the name kwei' accurately captures the restriction in the passage about how cassia was known in the herbal. The quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim.