William H. Ukers (author)
it had already been given the name of the discoverer, being known as _Coffea Laurentii_
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly says that Coffea robusta 'had already been given the name of the discoverer, being known as _Coffea Laurentii_', which directly supports the subject-predicate-object relationship claimed.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (not a named source). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage presents this as factual information. Sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's tone. Time is correctly null since the passage provides no specific temporal information for when this name was given. Context is appropriately empty as the passage doesn't restrict this to a particular sense or period. The quote appears verbatim in the passage and accurately supports the claim about Coffea robusta having been previously named Coffea Laurentii after its discoverer.