Scientific American Supplement
MEDICINAL properties of the husk of the coffee bean
judge verdicts (4)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The reference 'MEDICINAL properties of the husk of the coffee bean. Scientific American Supplement, Mar. 7, 1903, LV: 22-123' explicitly states that coffee husk has medicinal properties and provides the exact publication year (1903) cited in the claim.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.50 fail — The viewpoint qualifier is incorrect. The claim attributes the statement to 'author' but the passage does not name a specific author for this reference - it only cites the source publication 'Scientific American Supplement' from Mar. 7, 1903. The viewpoint should be either the publication name or null, not 'author'. Additionally, the context qualifier is empty when it should specify 'the husk' to distinguish this from medicinal properties of coffee more broadly, as the passage does. The time qualifier (1903) is faithful to the passage.
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage as a bibliographic entry: 'MEDICINAL properties of the husk of the coffee bean. Scientific American Supplement, Mar. 7, 1903, LV: 22-123.' The subject, predicate, and object are all explicitly present in the source material.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly attributes the claim to 'Scientific American Supplement' (the named source), the stance 'asserts' appropriately reflects the declarative nature of the title, sentiment is neutral as befits a technical journal article, the time qualifier correctly captures 'Mar. 7, 1903', the context accurately specifies 'of the husk' to distinguish this claim from general coffee medicinal properties, and the quote appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.