coffee is better than next lower type commodity

William H. Ukers (author)

• buyer must accept delivery under brazil grading if coffee is better than next lower type ⟨even if not up to ordered type⟩
  assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500

  the buyer must accept delivery if the coffee is better than the next lower type, even though not up to the type ordered

  judge verdicts (2)

  • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The exact statement 'the buyer must accept delivery if the coffee is better than the next lower type, even though not up to the type ordered' appears verbatim in the passage when describing the 'Brazil grading' provision.
  • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly uses 'author' since the passage itself makes this statement rather than attributing it to a named source. The stance 'asserts' matches the declarative nature of the passage. The sentiment is neutral, appropriately reflecting the factual/legal tone. The time qualifiers are all null, which is correct since the passage provides no temporal scope. The context accurately captures the limitation 'even though not up to the type ordered' from the passage. The quote is verbatim and directly supports the claim about buyer obligations under Brazil grading provisions.