idchkg
An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

coffee valorization commodity

concept · 2 mentions

economic policy of raising coffee prices through controlled supply

Other senses of “coffee valorization”

unspecified

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

Nation

  • coffee valorization raises prices coffee 1909
    assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
    RAISING prices by destruction. Nation, 1909.
    judge verdicts (4)
    • groundedness 0.90 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The article title 'RAISING prices by destruction' (Nation, 1909) explicitly states that coffee valorization raises prices, and multiple other sources in the bibliography confirm this theme (e.g., 'Why coffee costs twice as much', 'Why the price of coffee increases'). The timeframe 1909-1912 is also well-supported by the publication dates of the sources listed.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.45 fail — Multiple qualifier issues: (1) VIEWPOINT - the passage attributes 'RAISING prices by destruction' to 'Nation' (a publication), not an unnamed 'author'; the viewpoint should be 'Nation' not 'author'. (2) QUOTE - 'RAISING prices by destruction' is a title/heading, not a complete sentence that clearly supports the claim that 'coffee valorization raises prices' - it does not explicitly attribute this effect to valorization. (3) SENTIMENT - while the title may imply criticism, the claim's negative sentiment is not clearly conveyed by just the title alone without additional context from the article's content.
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The title 'RAISING prices by destruction' published in Nation in 1909 explicitly states that prices are being raised, which directly corresponds to the claim that coffee valorization raises prices on coffee. The passage entry matches the claim's subject, predicate, object, and temporal context.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — The viewpoint, stance, and time qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The quote 'RAISING prices by destruction' appears verbatim in the Nation 1909 entry. However, the sentiment qualifier should be 'negative' rather than 'neutral' - the phrase 'raising prices by destruction' carries a disapproving connotation (suggesting wasteful practices to artificially inflate prices), which is subtly different from a neutral presentation of facts. This is a minor issue but technically unfaithful to the passage's framing.

William H. Ukers (author)

  • Sao Paulo passed law authorizing agreement on coffee valorization 1905
    assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
    a law was passed authorizing the state to enter into an agreement with the other Brazil states and the federal government for the adoption of measures which would assure the valorization of coffee
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly says that in 1905 'a law was passed authorizing the state to enter into an agreement with the other Brazil states and the federal government for the adoption of measures which would assure the valorization of coffee.' This matches the subject (Sao Paulo), predicate (passed law authorizing agreement on), object (coffee valorization), and time (1905) of the claim.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (narrative voice), the stance is 'asserts' which matches the passage's declarative statement, the sentiment is neutral and appropriate, the time is 1905 which matches the passage's explicit date, the context is empty which is appropriate as the passage does not restrict the claim to a particular sense or role, and the quote appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.

Change over time

1905
  • passed law authorizing agreement on Sao Paulo
1909
  • raises prices coffee