passage
Coffees grading lower than No. 8 are not admissible to this country
judge verdicts (4)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'Coffees grading lower than No. 8 are not admissible to this country.' The subject, predicate, and object are precisely as written in the source text without rewording or interpretation.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.40 fail — Multiple qualifier errors: (1) viewpoint should be null or 'passage' rather than 'author' - the passage makes a direct statement without attributing it to a named source; (2) stance should be null or 'states' rather than 'disputes' - the passage presents this as a straightforward factual claim, not a disputed position; (3) sentiment should reflect the passage's neutral regulatory tone but 'disputes' incorrectly frames this as contentious. The quote is accurate and the predicate correctly uses 'not admissible', but the perspective qualifiers misrepresent the passage's framing as an authoritative statement rather than a disputed claim.
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated verbatim in the passage: 'Coffees grading lower than No. 8 are not admissible to this country.' All elements of the knowledge graph (subject, predicate, object) are explicitly present without any rewording or inference required.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the passage itself (not a named source). The stance 'asserts' matches the declarative framing. The sentiment is neutral, appropriate for a regulatory statement. The time qualifiers are all null, which is correct since the passage provides no temporal scope. The context 'import regulations' appropriately reflects the regulatory nature of the statement. The quote matches verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim.