An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

company unspecified sense

organization · 3 mentions

the entity that parceled out land, set prices, and controlled sugar production

Connections

The concepts, people, and places this entity is most linked to by claims — node size is mention count, colour is type, dashed nodes are other senses of the same word.

companyChinese sugar growers — 2 shared claimsLambert Food and Machinery Co. — 2 shared claimsproducers — 2 shared claimscorporation — 1 shared claimThomson & Taylor Co. — 1 shared claimnight — 1 shared claimcoffee — 1 shared claimmills — 1 shared claimeighteen tons per annum per mill — 1 shared claimseventy — 1 shared claimten more mills — 1 shared claimsugar — 1 shared claimChinese sugar growe…Lambert Food and Ma…producerscorporationThomson & Taylor Co.nightcoffeemillseighteen tons per a…seventyten more millssugar
ConceptPersonOrganization

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

William H. Ukers (author)

  • company is a corporation at present
    At present, the company is a corporation
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'At present, the company is a corporation, with C.E. Diefenthaler, president...' The exact wording matches the passage with no rewording needed.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage narrator states this as fact, not attributed to a named source). The stance is 'asserts' which matches the declarative nature of the statement. The sentiment is neutral, which is appropriate for this factual claim. The time qualifier 'at present' accurately reflects the passage's temporal framing. The context is empty, which is correct as the passage does not restrict this claim to a particular sense or role. The quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim.
  • company changed name to Thomson & Taylor Co. 1920
    The name was changed in 1920 to the Thomson & Taylor Co.
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'The name was changed in 1920 to the Thomson & Taylor Co.' The subject (referring to Thomson & Taylor Spice Co.), predicate, object, and time are all explicitly supported by the quoted sentence.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as historical fact without attribution to a named source). The stance 'asserts' is appropriate as the passage states this as fact. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's neutral tone. The time qualifier correctly specifies 1920 with valid_from of 1920 and null valid_to. The context is appropriately empty as the passage does not restrict this to a specific sense or role. The quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim about the name change.
  • company is most numerous night night
    the company is then most numerous, for it is their favourite hour
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The exact phrase 'the company is then most numerous, for it is their favourite hour' appears verbatim in the text, explicitly stating that the company (people visiting the places) is most numerous at night.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (implicit narrator), the stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage makes a direct factual claim, sentiment is neutral, the temporal qualifier 'when: night' correctly captures the passage's specification that this occurs at night ('their favourite hour'), and the quote is verbatim and directly supports the claim. Context is appropriately empty as no specific sense or role restriction applies.
  • company sat till sunset then drank coffee at informal dinner parties
    at informal dinner parties the company "sat till sunset--then coffee."
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 0.70 pass — The claim is supported by the passage, though with minor rewording. The passage states 'at informal dinner parties the company "sat till sunset--then coffee,"' which directly supports that the company drank coffee after sunset at informal dinner parties. The predicate uses "drank" while the passage uses the elliptical construction "then coffee," but this is a minor stylistic variation that preserves the factual meaning.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.80 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. Viewpoint, stance, and sentiment are appropriate. The quote is verbatim and accurately represents the passage. However, there is a minor issue with the predicate: the passage says 'sat till sunset--then coffee' which more naturally reads as 'then [they had] coffee' rather than 'then drank coffee.' The verb 'drank' is inferred rather than explicitly stated in the quote, making the predicate slightly less faithful to the exact wording, though the meaning is preserved. The temporal qualifier 'at informal dinner parties' is appropriately vague as the passage specifies only 'Washington's time' and 'informal dinner parties' without precise dates, so null values for valid_from and valid_to are correct.
  • Itchoglans receive coffee from and present to company ⟨houses of persons of quality⟩
    assertspositivesource: coffee-pg28500
    there are pages, called _Itchoglans_, who receive the coffee from the stewards, and present it to the company with surprising dexterity and address
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The exact quote provided matches the text, which explicitly states that Itchoglans 'receive the coffee from the stewards, and present it to the company with surprising dexterity and address' in the houses of persons of quality.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage itself makes the assertion). The stance is properly characterized as 'asserts' - the passage makes a straightforward factual claim. The sentiment 'positive' accurately reflects the passage's connotation, particularly through the phrase 'with surprising dexterity and address' which praises the Itchoglans' performance. Time qualifiers are correctly set to null as the passage provides no temporal specification. The context 'houses of persons of quality' is accurately extracted from the passage: 'In the houses of persons of quality likewise, there are pages, called _Itchoglans_...'. The quote is verbatim and directly supports the claim about the Itchoglans' role in receiving and presenting coffee.
  • Swain, Earle & Co. was established company about 1868
    Swain, Earle & Co. were established about 1868
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'Swain, Earle & Co. were established about 1868.' The subject, predicate, object, and temporal information all match exactly what is written.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage makes this assertion as a statement of fact). The stance 'asserts' is appropriate as the passage states this without dispute. The sentiment is neutral, matching the factual tone. The time qualifier 'about 1868' with valid_from 1868 and null valid_to matches the passage's temporal scope. The context is empty, which is appropriate as the passage provides none. The quote appears verbatim in the passage and supports the claim.
  • W.S. Warfield and John D. Warfield obtained controlling interest in company 1901
    obtained a controlling interest
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'W.S. Warfield, of Quincy, Ill., who, in 1901, with his son, John D. Warfield, bought most of Mr. Thomson's holdings and obtained a controlling interest.' The subject, predicate, object, and time are all explicitly supported.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The quote is verbatim, the time (1901) is correct, the viewpoint (author) is appropriate since the passage does not attribute this to a named source, and the stance and sentiment are accurate. However, the context field is empty when it should specify that this controlling interest was in 'Thomson & Taylor Spice Co.' to be fully faithful to the passage's specificity. The object 'company' is vague; it should be more specific to match the passage's reference to the actual entity involved.
  • Wm. Boardman & Sons Co. was incorporated company 1898
    The company was incorporated in 1898
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'The company was incorporated in 1898, and John Pepion was admitted.' The subject, predicate, object, and time are all explicitly supported by the text without any rewording or outside knowledge required.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage is written from an authorial perspective). The stance is correctly marked as 'asserts' - the passage states this as fact without dispute. The sentiment is neutral, matching the factual tone. The time is accurate: 'when' is 1898, 'valid_from' is 1898, and 'valid_to' is null (no end date given). The context is appropriately empty as no specific sense or role is restricted. The quote 'The company was incorporated in 1898' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.
  • O.W. Pierce Company was incorporated company 1905
    The company was incorporated in 1905
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'The company was incorporated in 1905 with O.W. Pierce, Jr. as its head.' The subject, predicate, and time are all explicitly supported without any rewording or outside knowledge required.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage states facts without attribution to a named source). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage presents this as factual information. The sentiment is neutral, matching the neutral tone of the passage. The time qualifier correctly reflects the passage's statement '1905' with valid_from set to 1905 and valid_to as null (no end date specified). The context is empty, which is appropriate as the passage does not restrict the claim to a particular sense or role. The quote 'The company was incorporated in 1905' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.
  • Canby, Ach & Canby was incorporated company 1904
    When the company was incorporated as Canby, Ach & Canby in 1904
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'When the company was incorporated as Canby, Ach & Canby in 1904' explicitly confirms that Canby, Ach & Canby was incorporated in 1904.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as historical fact without attribution to a specific named source). The stance is 'asserts' which matches the passage's straightforward presentation. The sentiment is neutral, appropriate for a factual business incorporation. The time qualifier correctly specifies 1904 with valid_from matching the incorporation date and valid_to as null (no end date given). The context is empty, which is appropriate as the passage does not restrict this claim to a particular sense or role. The quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim about the incorporation of Canby, Ach & Canby in 1904.
  • in 1892 the Geiger-Tinney Company was formed
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'in 1892 the Geiger-Tinney Company was formed with F.J. Geiger as president.' The subject, predicate, object, and time are all explicitly supported without requiring outside knowledge or generalization.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage itself makes the statement, not a named source). The stance is properly 'asserts' as the passage presents it as fact. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's neutral tone. The time is accurate (1892), with valid_from correctly set to 1892 and valid_to as null since the passage doesn't specify when the company ceased to be called by this name (it was renamed in 1912). The context is appropriately empty as the passage doesn't restrict the claim to a specific sense or role. The quote appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.
  • Jabez Burns & Sons, Inc. was incorporated company 1906
    in 1906, incorporated as Jabez Burns & Sons, Inc.
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage, which explicitly states 'in 1906, incorporated as Jabez Burns & Sons, Inc.' The subject, predicate, object, and time are all directly stated without requiring outside knowledge or over-generalization.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage states this as historical fact without attribution to a named source). The stance is accurately 'asserts' - the passage straightforwardly states the incorporation occurred. The sentiment is neutral, matching the factual, non-evaluative tone of the passage. The time is correctly specified as 1906 with valid_from matching the incorporation date and valid_to as null (no end date mentioned). The context is appropriately empty as no specific sense or role restriction applies. The quote 'in 1906, incorporated as Jabez Burns & Sons, Inc.' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.
  • In 1901, the Lambert Food and Machinery Co. was organized
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'In 1901, the Lambert Food and Machinery Co. was organized.' The subject, predicate, object, and temporal information all match exactly what is written.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (no named source is given in the passage). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage states this as fact. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's neutral tone. The time qualifier correctly reflects the passage's explicit date of 1901, with valid_from set to 1901 and valid_to as null (no end date specified). The context is empty, which is appropriate as the passage does not restrict this claim to a specific sense or role. The quote matches verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim.
  • In 1904, the company was reorganized
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'In 1904, the company was reorganized.' The subject (Lambert Food and Machinery Co.), predicate (was reorganized), object (company), and time (1904) all match exactly with the text provided.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as factual narrative). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as a straightforward factual statement. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's neutral tone. The time qualifier correctly identifies 1904 with valid_from and null valid_to, which is appropriate since the passage gives only the year without specifying duration. The context is empty as the passage provides no restrictive context about which sense or role of the company is meant. The quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim.

George M. Rolph (author)

  • company parceled out land to Chinese sugar growers
    assertsneutralsource: sugar-pg73616
    parceled out land to Chinese sugar growers
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage's opening sentence: 'It also parceled out land to Chinese sugar growers and granted them special concessions in consideration of the entire product of the land being sold to the company at an agreed figure.' The exact language matches the claim.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage itself makes this statement without attributing it to a named source). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage states this as fact. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's objective tone. The time qualifiers are correctly null since the passage provides no specific date for this action. The context is appropriately empty as no specific sense or role is restricted. The quote appears verbatim in the passage and supports the claim.
  • company granted special concessions to Chinese sugar growers
    assertsneutralsource: sugar-pg73616
    granted them special concessions
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'It also parceled out land to Chinese sugar growers and granted them special concessions in consideration of the entire product of the land being sold to the company at an agreed figure.' The subject (company), predicate (granted special concessions to), and object (Chinese sugar growers) are all explicitly mentioned without requiring outside knowledge or over-generalization.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as historical fact rather than attributing it to a named source). The stance is 'asserts' which matches the passage's straightforward presentation. The sentiment is neutral, appropriate for a factual historical account. The time qualifiers are all null, which is correct since the passage provides no specific date for when the concessions were granted. The context is empty, which is appropriate as there are no disambiguating restrictions. The quote 'granted them special concessions' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.
  • company prohibited the erection of new mills mills ⟨to restrict production and keep up prices⟩
    assertsneutralsource: sugar-pg73616
    it prohibited the erection of any new mills
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'The policy of the company, however, was to restrict production so as to keep up prices, and to this end it prohibited the erection of any new mills.' The subject (company), predicate (prohibited the erection of new mills), and object (mills) are all explicitly supported with the exact reasoning (to restrict production and keep up prices) provided in the claim.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. Viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage describes the company's policy without naming a specific source). Stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage states this as fact. Sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's objective tone. Time qualifiers are correctly null since the passage provides temporal context ("By 1710") but the claim itself does not require a specific timestamp. Context accurately reflects the passage's explanation that this policy was "to restrict production so as to keep up prices." The quote is verbatim and directly supports the claim.
  • assertsneutralsource: sugar-pg73616
    limited the output of those that were running to eighteen tons per annum each
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage, which explicitly states that the company 'limited the output of those that were running to eighteen tons per annum each.' The wording matches the source material precisely.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The quote is verbatim and accurately supports the predicate and object. However, the time qualifier is incomplete: the passage indicates this policy was implemented during a specific period ('The policy of the company, however, was to restrict production...'), and the context suggests this occurred after 1710 when 130 mills were in operation. While the passage does not provide an exact start date for this policy, it does provide temporal context that could be inferred from the surrounding narrative. The 'when' field being null is acceptable given no explicit date is stated, but this is a minor qualifier issue. All other qualifiers (viewpoint, stance, sentiment, context, quote) are faithful and accurate.
  • company decided to raise the number to seventy 1745
    assertsneutralsource: sugar-pg73616
    The company then decided to raise the number to seventy
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'The company then decided to raise the number to seventy' appears verbatim in the text, with the context clearly indicating this decision occurred in 1745 when only sixty-five mills were in operation.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly identified as 'author' (the passage presents this as historical fact without attribution to a named source). The stance 'asserts' appropriately reflects the declarative nature of the passage. The sentiment is neutral, matching the factual tone. The time qualifier correctly identifies 1745 as 'when' with valid_from and null valid_to, consistent with the passage's temporal scope ('in 1745'). The context is appropriately empty as no specific sense or role restriction applies. The quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim.
  • company added ten more mills five years after 1745
    assertsneutralsource: sugar-pg73616
    five years later it added ten more
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'The company then decided to raise the number to seventy, and five years later it added ten more.' This directly supports that the company added ten more mills five years after 1745 (i.e., in 1750).
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. Viewpoint is correctly 'author' (the passage itself states this fact without attribution to a named source). Stance is correctly 'asserts' (the passage presents this as fact). Sentiment is appropriately 'neutral' (the passage is factual and non-evaluative). Time is accurate: the passage states 'five years later' after mentioning 1745, making the date 1750, and the normalized dates (valid_from: 1750, valid_to: 1750) correctly reflect this temporal scope. Context is appropriately empty since the passage provides no specific sense restriction. The quote 'five years later it added ten more' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.
  • company did not consider itself obligated to take delivery of definite amount sugar
    assertsneutralsource: sugar-pg73616
    it did not consider itself obligated to take delivery of any definite amount
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly says the company 'did not consider itself obligated to take delivery of any definite amount,' which matches the predicate exactly, with only minor rewording from 'any definite amount' to 'definite amount.'
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — All qualifiers are faithful. The quote is verbatim and appears in the correct context about the company's obligations. Viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (implicit from the passage's narrative voice), stance is appropriately 'asserts', sentiment is neutral, time is correctly null (passage doesn't specify when this condition existed), and context is appropriately empty. Minor deduction (0.1) only for context being empty when 'in the sugar industry' or 'historically' could have been specified for clarity, though this is not strictly necessary given the passage provides sufficient contextual framing.
  • assertsneutralsource: sugar-pg73616
    About 1874, the California Sugar Manufacturing company was formed
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'About 1874, the California Sugar Manufacturing company was formed.' The subject, predicate, object, time reference, and neutral stance all match the source text exactly without any rewording or outside knowledge required.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage provides no named source for this statement). The stance is accurately marked as 'asserts' since the passage straightforwardly states the fact. The sentiment is appropriately neutral for a factual statement. The time qualifier correctly reflects the passage's 'About 1874' with matching normalized dates. The context is appropriately empty as the passage provides no contextual restriction. The quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim.
  • Dutch West India company was dissolved company 1791
    assertsneutralsource: sugar-pg73616
    the company was dissolved
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'The colony of Essequibo was under the administration of the Dutch West India company from 1621 until 1791, when the company was dissolved.' This directly confirms that the Dutch West India company was dissolved in 1791.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author/passage narrator. The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage states this as fact. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's neutral tone. The time is correctly specified as 1791, matching 'when the company was dissolved' in the passage. The context is appropriately empty as no specific sense or role restriction is needed. The quote 'the company was dissolved' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.
  • producers were at loggerheads with company
    assertsneutralsource: sugar-pg73616
    The producers had always been at loggerheads with the company
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — This claim is directly stated in the passage: 'The producers had always been at loggerheads with the company, for while they were bound to deliver their entire output to the company, it did not consider itself obligated to take delivery of any definite amount.' The exact phrasing matches the source text.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as historical narrative fact, not as an attributed source statement). The stance is accurately 'asserts' - the passage states this as fact. The sentiment is neutral, reflecting the passage's objective tone. The time qualifier is correctly null, as the passage does not specify when this conflict occurred. The context is empty as appropriate. The quote appears verbatim in the passage and accurately supports the claim.
  • producers were bound to deliver entire output to company
    assertsneutralsource: sugar-pg73616
    they were bound to deliver their entire output to the company
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The exact phrase 'they were bound to deliver their entire output to the company' appears verbatim in the text, describing the regulatory obligation placed on producers in the sugar industry.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (passage describes the situation factually). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' (the passage states this as fact, not as disputed). The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's objective tone. Time qualifiers are correctly null since the passage provides no specific temporal restriction for this general relationship. Context is empty as appropriate since no specific sense or role restriction applies. The quote appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim about producers being bound to deliver their entire output to the company.

Change over time

1745
  • decided to raise the number to seventy
five years after 1745
  • added ten more mills
1791
  • was dissolved Dutch West India company
about 1868
  • was established Swain, Earle & Co.
About 1874
  • formed California Sugar Manufacturing company
1892
  • was formed Geiger-Tinney Company
1898
  • was incorporated Wm. Boardman & Sons Co.
1901
  • obtained controlling interest in W.S. Warfield and John D. Warfield
  • was organized Lambert Food and Machinery Co.
1904
  • was incorporated Canby, Ach & Canby
  • was reorganized Lambert Food and Machinery Co.
1905
  • was incorporated O.W. Pierce Company
1906
  • was incorporated Jabez Burns & Sons, Inc.
1920
  • changed name to Thomson & Taylor Co.
at informal dinner parties
  • sat till sunset then drank coffee
at present
  • is a corporation
night
  • is most numerous night