An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

compared to 1920 unspecified sense

concept · 1 mention

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

William H. Ukers (author)

  • coffee have value decrease compared to 1920 1921
    assertsnegativesource: coffee-pg28500
    the value fell off almost one-half as compared with 1920
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The text explicitly states 'the value fell off almost one-half as compared with 1920,' which directly matches the claim that coffee had a value decrease compared to 1920 in 1921.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage itself states the observation). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage presents this as fact. The sentiment 'negative' accurately reflects the connotation of 'fell off' in the passage. The time qualifiers correctly specify 1921 as the year of the claim. The context is appropriately empty as the passage does not restrict the claim to a particular sense or role. The quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim about the value decrease from 1921 compared to 1920.
  • coffee have value decrease compared to 1920 1921 ⟨US imports⟩
    assertsnegativesource: coffee-pg28500
    the value fell off almost one-half as compared with 1920
    judge verdicts (4)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The passage directly states that in 1921 the value of coffee fell 'more than one-half as compared with the year before' (1919), explicitly supporting the claim that coffee value decreased compared to 1919.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.60 fail — The quote qualifier is unfaithful. The passage states 'the value fell off almost one-half as compared with 1920, and more than one-half as compared with the year before,' but the year before 1921 is 1920, not 1919. The claim's object states 'compared to 1919' while the quote and passage refer to comparing 1921 to 1920 (the year before). Additionally, the quote does not directly support a value decrease compared to 1919 - the passage is comparing 1921 to 1920 with that specific quote. The comparison to 1919 appears in a different sentence with different phrasing ('more than one-half as compared with the year before' refers to 1920, not 1919).
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The final sentence explicitly states 'the value fell off almost one-half as compared with 1920,' which directly supports the subject-predicate-object relationship that coffee had a value decrease compared to 1920 in the context of US imports in 1921.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. Viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage is written in third-person analytical style without attribution to a named source). Stance is 'asserts' which matches the declarative statement. Sentiment is 'negative' which is appropriate for 'fell off.' Time is correctly set to 1921 with matching valid_from and valid_to dates. Context 'US imports' is accurate as the passage discusses coffee imports entering US ports. The quote 'the value fell off almost one-half as compared with 1920' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim about value decrease.

Change over time

1921
  • have value decrease coffee
  • have value decrease coffee