William H. Ukers (author)
Cuper's, where the charge for admission subsequently was fixed at not less than a shilling
judge verdicts (4)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'Cuper's, where the charge for admission subsequently was fixed at not less than a shilling.' The subject, predicate, object, and temporal qualifier (subsequently) are all explicitly present without requiring outside knowledge or over-generalization.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.60 fail — The viewpoint qualifier is unfaithful. The passage does not attribute this statement to a named source; it is presented as the author's own assertion. The claim should use 'author' as the viewpoint (or null if the schema allows), not 'author' stated as if it were already correct. Additionally, the context field should be null or empty, not 'subsequently' - 'subsequently' is a temporal qualifier (captured in 'when'), not a contextual one. The quote is accurate and the stance/sentiment are correct, but these two qualifier errors prevent the claim from meeting the 0.7 threshold.
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage with identical wording: 'Cuper's, where the charge for admission subsequently was fixed at not less than a shilling.' This is a straightforward extraction with no rewording or interpretation required.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is highly faithful to the passage. All qualifiers are accurate: viewpoint is 'author' (the passage itself states this, not attributed to a named source), stance is 'asserts' (the passage straightforwardly states the fact), sentiment is 'neutral' (the passage presents this without connotation), time is 'subsequently' (matching the passage's 'subsequently'), and the quote is verbatim. The only minor point: context is empty, which is appropriate since the passage provides no contextual restriction for this claim. All qualifiers faithfully reflect the passage.