idchkg
An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

description unspecified sense

concept · 1 mention

specification of coffee characteristics in trade contracts

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

William H. Ukers (author)

  • coffee is sold on description ⟨France⟩
    assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
    coffee is sold on description
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'Inquiry regarding this subject discloses that coffee is sold on description.' This exact phrase appears verbatim, making it fully supported by the text.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author/narrator who is reporting this fact about French coffee trading practices. The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage states this as a fact. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's matter-of-fact tone. The time qualifier is correctly null since the passage does not specify a particular time period. The context 'France' is accurate and matches the passage's focus on French trading practices. The quote 'coffee is sold on description' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.

sellers

  • description is given in good faith but not guaranteed by seller ⟨in protective contract clauses⟩
    assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
    the description is given in good faith, but is not guaranteed by the seller
    judge verdicts (4)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The exact phrase 'the description is given in good faith, but is not guaranteed by the seller' appears verbatim in the final paragraph, describing a protective clause that some sellers insert into contracts regarding special features of description.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.60 fail — VIEWPOINT ERROR: The claim attributes this to the 'author' but the passage explicitly states 'some sellers protect themselves against claims for difference on this score by inserting in the contract a clause to the effect that...' The viewpoint should be 'sellers' (the named source making this stipulation), not 'author'. All other qualifiers are faithful: stance is correctly 'asserts', sentiment is neutral, time is correctly null, context appropriately specifies protective contract clauses, and the quote is verbatim.
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly states: 'some sellers protect themselves against claims for difference on this score by inserting in the contract a clause to the effect that the description is given in good faith, but is not guaranteed by the seller.' This exactly matches the subject-predicate-object relationship described in the claim.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly identifies 'sellers' as the source of this stipulation. The stance 'asserts' accurately reflects how the passage presents this as a protective measure. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's matter-of-fact tone. The time qualifiers are appropriately null since no temporal information is provided. The context 'in protective contract clauses' faithfully reflects the passage's statement that 'some sellers protect themselves against claims for difference on this score by inserting in the contract a clause.' The quote appears verbatim and directly supports the claim about the seller's good faith provision and non-guarantee of description.