dinner unspecified sense

event · 7 mentions

a meal where coffee is served and its quality affects the overall experience

Connections

The concepts, people, and places this entity is most linked to by claims — node size is mention count, colour is type, dashed nodes are other senses of the same word.

ConceptPersonWork

Defining properties

occurs at two o'clock
was usually served three o'clock in the afternoon
is the balancing point of coffee ⟨advertising copy directed at expert judge customer segment⟩
would serve as coffee with milk and a roll
is a poor coffee with milk and a roll
is a confoundedly poor dinner coffee with milk and a roll
would enjoy small dinner at small cost Wilkie ⟨early life⟩
was always the last dropper-in for Wilkie ⟨at a house⟩
is served at dinner cafe noir ⟨dinner⟩

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

William H. Ukers (author)

dinner occurs at two o'clock at two
assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
At two we generally go to dinner
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'At two we generally go to dinner' explicitly establishes that dinner occurs at two o'clock according to the author's account.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage uses first-person 'we'). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the author states this as a general practice. The sentiment is neutral, matching the matter-of-fact tone. The time qualifier 'at two' is exactly as stated in the passage. The context is appropriately empty as the passage provides no restrictive context. The quote is verbatim and directly supports the claim.
dinner was usually served three o'clock in the afternoon in Washington's time
assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
In Washington's time, dinner was usually served at three o'clock in the afternoon
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'In Washington's time, dinner was usually served at three o'clock in the afternoon.' The subject, predicate, object, time reference, and perspective all match the passage exactly with no added interpretation or outside knowledge required.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as historical information without attributing it to a named source). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage states this as fact. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's neutral tone. The temporal qualifier 'in Washington's time' is accurate to the passage. The context is appropriately empty as the passage does not restrict this to a particular sense or role. The quote is verbatim and directly supports the claim.
cafe noir is served at dinner dinner dinner ⟨dinner⟩
assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
At dinner, the _cafe noir_ is served
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'At dinner, the _cafe noir_ is served.' This is a straightforward extraction of the text with no rewording or outside knowledge required.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The viewpoint, stance, sentiment, and quote are all accurate and properly attributed to the author. The context correctly identifies the dinner setting. Minor deduction: the 'time' field uses 'when': 'dinner' which is not a temporal date or period, but rather a meal context. Since the passage provides no actual temporal scope (no dates, eras, or time periods), 'when' should be null or empty, and the temporal context should be captured in the 'context' field instead. The claim would be perfect if 'time.when' were null with the dinner context properly located elsewhere.

Mr. Cunningham

Wilkie would enjoy small dinner at small cost dinner in early life ⟨early life⟩
assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
in early life, Wilkie would enjoy a small dinner at a small cost
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. Mr. Cunningham explicitly relates that 'in early life, Wilkie would enjoy a small dinner at a small cost,' which matches the subject, predicate, object, timeframe, and perspective of the claim exactly.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The viewpoint (Mr. Cunningham), stance (asserts), and sentiment (neutral) are all correct. The time qualifier 'in early life' accurately matches the passage. The context 'early life' is appropriately captured. The quote is verbatim and supports the claim. Minor deduction (0.15): The quote attribution could be more precise—the passage shows Mr. Cunningham relating information told to him by 'an old frequenter of the house,' creating a secondary source layer. However, Mr. Cunningham is still the named source presenting this information, so the viewpoint attribution is acceptable. Overall, the qualifiers are faithful to the passage.
Wilkie was always the last dropper-in for dinner ⟨at a house⟩
assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
Wilkie was always the last dropper-in for dinner
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 0.70 pass — The claim is stated in the passage with minor rewording. The passage quotes Mr. Cunningham relating that 'Wilkie was always the last dropper-in for dinner,' which directly supports the claim, though the original text attributes this observation to 'an old frequenter of the house' rather than Mr. Cunningham himself observing it directly.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.95 pass — Viewpoint is incorrect. The passage explicitly attributes this claim to 'an old frequenter of the house' via Mr. Cunningham's relation: 'I have been told by an old frequenter of the house, that Wilkie was always the last dropper-in for dinner.' The viewpoint should be 'an old frequenter of the house' (the original source), not 'Mr. Cunningham' (who is merely relaying the account). All other qualifiers are faithful: stance is correct (asserts), sentiment is neutral, time is appropriately null, context is appropriate, and the quote is verbatim.

M. Saint-Foix

coffee with milk and a roll is a poor dinner
assertsnegativesource: coffee-pg28500
a cup of coffee, with milk and a roll, is a confoundedly poor dinner
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly and repeatedly stated in the passage. M. Saint-Foix explicitly asserts multiple times that 'a cup of coffee, with milk and a roll, is a confoundedly poor dinner,' and this exact quote appears verbatim in the passage, making the claim fully grounded and supported.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly attributes the statement to M. Saint-Foix (not 'author'). The stance 'asserts' is accurate—Saint-Foix makes a definitive assertion rather than disputing or questioning. The sentiment 'negative' correctly reflects the negative connotation ('confoundedly poor'). The time qualifiers are appropriately null since the passage provides no specific temporal information. The context is correctly empty as the passage does not restrict the claim to a particular sense or role. The quote appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.

Saint-Foix

coffee with milk and a roll is a confoundedly poor dinner dinner
assertsnegativesource: coffee-pg28500
a cup of coffee, with milk and a roll, was a confoundedly poor dinner
judge verdicts (4)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The Duke de Noailles explicitly states 'Why, so it is' in response to Saint-Foix's assertion that coffee with milk and a roll is a confoundedly poor dinner, thereby affirming that it is indeed a poor dinner.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.50 fail — Multiple qualifier failures: (1) VIEWPOINT - The claim attributes the assertion to 'Duke de Noailles', but the Duke merely agrees with Saint-Foix's already-stated position ('Why, so it is'). The primary viewpoint expressing this conviction throughout is Saint-Foix, not the Duke. (2) SENTIMENT - The claim marks sentiment as 'neutral', but the passage frames the claim with language like 'confoundedly poor', which carries negative connotation, not neutrality. (3) QUOTE - The quote 'Why, so it is' is the Duke's agreement, not a complete expression of the full claim and does not adequately support the predicate 'is a poor dinner' on its own; the substantive framing comes from Saint-Foix's repeated assertions.
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage multiple times. Saint-Foix repeatedly asserts that 'a cup of coffee, with milk and a roll, is a confoundedly poor dinner,' and this statement is even validated by the Duke de Noailles who says 'Why, so it is.'
- qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The viewpoint (Saint-Foix), stance (asserts), sentiment (negative), and time qualifiers (null, appropriate since no specific date is given) are all correct. The quote is accurate and appears verbatim in the passage. The context is appropriately empty since the passage does not restrict this to a particular sense or role. However, there is a minor issue: the quote provided is 'a cup of coffee, with milk and a roll, was a confoundedly poor dinner' but the passage uses 'is' rather than 'was' in most instances (e.g., 'a cup of coffee, with milk and a roll, is a confoundedly poor dinner'). While a version with 'was' does appear once in the passage ('that a cup of coffee, with milk and a roll, was a confoundedly poor dinner'), the more frequent and emphatic formulation uses 'is', which would be a more representative quote. This is a minor deviation from the most faithful representation.

advertising copy by W. Harry Longe

coffee is the balancing point of dinner ⟨advertising copy directed at expert judge customer segment⟩
assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
The corner of the table that holds the coffee urn is the balancing point of your dinner.
judge verdicts (4)
- groundedness 0.70 pass — The claim is substantially stated in the passage, though with minor rewording. The passage explicitly says 'The corner of the table that holds the coffee urn is the balancing point of your dinner,' which directly supports that coffee (or the coffee urn) is the balancing point of dinner. The slight difference between 'the corner of the table that holds the coffee urn' and just 'coffee' represents a minor simplification but captures the core assertion.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.50 fail — The viewpoint is incorrect. The passage attributes this statement to an advertising appeal created by W. Harry Longe, not directly asserted by Longe himself as the claim suggests. The quote is part of advertising copy ('ready made' copy appeals) that Longe prepared to appeal to a specific customer class ('Mrs. Know-it-all-about-Coffee'). The viewpoint should reflect that this is advertising rhetoric aimed at a particular audience, not Longe's direct assertion. Additionally, the context qualifier is empty but should specify that this is from advertising/marketing copy directed at a particular customer segment.
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The advertising copy by W. Harry Longe explicitly states: 'The corner of the table that holds the coffee urn is the balancing point of your dinner.' The claim accurately captures this assertion from the passage.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage qualifiers. The quote is verbatim and accurately attributed to W. Harry Longe's advertising copy. The viewpoint, stance, and sentiment are correct. The time qualifiers (all null) are appropriate since no temporal scope is specified. However, the context qualifier is slightly imprecise: while the passage does indicate this appeal is "found effective" for "Mrs. Know-it-all-about-Coffee" (the expert judge segment), the passage frames it more broadly as copy that has been "found effective" rather than explicitly "directed at" that segment. The passage states this is the style used for that class, making the directional framing accurate but the phrasing of context could be more precisely tied to the passage's language of effectiveness testing.

officer of the king's body-guard

coffee with milk and a roll would serve as dinner
assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
It will serve me for a dinner
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The officer explicitly states 'It will serve me for a dinner' when ordering coffee with milk and a roll, which is accurately captured in the claim's subject, predicate, and object. The perspective attribution to the officer is also correct.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The quote is verbatim and the officer does assert that coffee with milk and a roll will serve as dinner. However, the sentiment qualifier should be "practical" or "matter-of-fact" rather than "neutral," since the officer is making a pragmatic statement about using the meal as a substitute for dinner, which carries implied acceptance of limited circumstances. The viewpoint and stance are correct, and the time qualifiers (all null) appropriately reflect that the passage provides no temporal information. The context is appropriately empty as the passage does not restrict the claim to a specific sense or role beyond the food items themselves.

Change over time

at two

occurs at two o'clock

dinner

is served at dinner cafe noir

in Washington's time

was usually served three o'clock in the afternoon

in early life

would enjoy small dinner at small cost Wilkie