An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

disk pulper machine

concept · 2 mentions

pulping machine with copper surface punched with oval knobs

Other senses of “disk pulper”

equipment

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

William H. Ukers (author)

  • disk pulper have copper pulping surface with oval knobs copper pulping surface
    copper pulping surface was punched, or knobbed, by a blind punch that raised rows of oval knobs
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage, which explicitly states that John Walker's disk pulper had 'the copper pulping surface was punched, or knobbed, by a blind punch that raised rows of oval knobs.' The description matches the claim's assertion about the copper pulping surface having oval knobs.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (no named source in the passage attributes this to anyone specific). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage presents this as factual information about John Walker's patent. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's matter-of-fact description. The time qualifiers are correctly null since the passage does not provide general temporal scope for this characteristic. The context is appropriately empty as the passage does not restrict the claim to a particular sense or role. The quote is verbatim and directly supports the claim about the oval knobs on the copper pulping surface.
  • John Walker granted english patent on disk pulper disk pulper 1860
    John Walker was granted (1860) an English patent on a disk pulper
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage's opening sentence: 'John Walker was granted (1860) an English patent on a disk pulper.' All key elements (subject, predicate, object, and date) are explicitly mentioned with no rewording or interpretation required.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (not a named source). The stance is 'asserts' which matches the passage's straightforward attribution. The sentiment is neutral, appropriate for a factual patent grant. The time is correctly set to 1860 with no valid_to date, matching the passage's temporal scope. The context is empty, which is appropriate as the passage provides none. The quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim.
  • John Walker is granted a patent on disk pulper 1860 ⟨England⟩
    John Walker is granted a patent in England on a disk pulper for pulping Arabian coffee
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The exact sentence 'John Walker is granted a patent in England on a disk pulper for pulping Arabian coffee' appears in the 1860 entry, confirming all elements of the claim: subject, predicate, object, time, and context.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The viewpoint should be 'passage' or 'source' rather than 'author' since the passage itself attributes this patent grant without naming a personal source. All other qualifiers (stance: asserts, sentiment: neutral, time: 1860, context: England, and the exact quote) are faithful to the passage text.

Change over time

1860
  • granted english patent on disk pulper John Walker
  • is granted a patent on John Walker