idchkg
An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

documented unspecified sense

concept · 1 mention

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

William H. Ukers (author)

  • Canephora, C. has botanical description documented ⟨botanical classification⟩
    assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
    Botanical description, 145
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. Under the entry '_Canephora, C._', there is a sub-entry 'Botanical description, 145', which explicitly documents that a botanical description exists for this species, referenced on page 145.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. All qualifiers are appropriate: viewpoint as 'author' is correct (the passage itself presents this information as a reference index), stance 'asserts' is appropriate, sentiment 'neutral' matches the factual tone, time qualifiers are correctly null (no temporal information given), and context 'botanical classification' appropriately reflects the botanical nature of the reference. The quote 'Botanical description, 145' appears verbatim in the passage under the _Canephora, C._ entry. Minor deduction (0.1) only because the context could be slightly more specific (e.g., 'botanical description of the plant' rather than 'botanical classification'), though the current phrasing is acceptable and not unfaithful.
  • coffee has calorific value documented
    assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
    Calorific value of c., 180
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 0.70 pass — The passage directly states 'Calorific value of c., 180' where 'c.' refers to coffee (based on context of this being a coffee index). The claim that coffee has documented calorific value is supported by this entry, though it's a minimal index reference rather than detailed exposition.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The quote 'Calorific value of c., 180' appears verbatim in the passage. The viewpoint is correctly identified as 'author' (the passage itself documents this fact without attribution to a named source). The stance 'asserts' is appropriate as the passage presents this as factual information. The sentiment 'neutral' matches the objective, informational tone. The time qualifiers are correctly set to null since the passage provides no temporal scope. The context is appropriately empty as the passage does not restrict this claim to a particular sense or role of coffee.