An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

effect unspecified sense

concept · 1 mention

Connections

The concepts, people, and places this entity is most linked to by claims — node size is mention count, colour is type, dashed nodes are other senses of the same word.

effectcoffee — 1 shared claimattempt to discredit coffee — 1 shared claimChinese or Japanese tea with assistance of other things — 1 shared claimcoffeeattempt to discredi…Chinese or Japanese…
Concept

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

William H. Ukers (author)

  • coffee had immeasurable effect effect
    assertspositivesource: coffee-pg28500
    Its effect was immeasurable
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage, which explicitly states 'Its effect was immeasurable' in reference to coffee. The author clearly asserts this with positive sentiment throughout the text.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly identified as 'author' (the passage presents this as authorial assertion without attribution to a named source). The stance 'asserts' is accurate - the author makes a definitive statement. The sentiment 'positive' correctly reflects the passage's favorable framing of coffee's effects throughout. The time qualifiers are appropriately null since the passage provides no specific temporal scope for this effect. The context is correctly empty as the passage does not restrict coffee to a particular sense or role at this point. The quote 'Its effect was immeasurable' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim about coffee's immeasurable effect.
  • fails of effect
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The 1679 entry explicitly states 'An attempt by the physicians of Marseilles to discredit coffee on purely dietetic grounds fails of effect,' which matches the subject, predicate, and object of the claim.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The quote 'fails of effect' appears verbatim and correctly supports the claim. Time (1679) is accurate. Perspective, stance, and sentiment are appropriately attributed to the author. However, minor context specificity is missing: the passage specifies this attempt was 'by the physicians of Marseilles' on 'purely dietetic grounds,' which provides important narrowing of the claim's scope that could enhance clarity, though the claim as stated is not technically unfaithful.

Simon Paulli (author)

  • Chinese or Japanese tea with assistance of other things may produce particular effect that tea will not do in europe effect
    Thus, it may happen, that the _Chinese_, or _Japonese Tea_, with the Assistance and Concurrence of other Things, may produce a particular Effect, which _Tea_ will not do in _Europe_.
    judge verdicts (4)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The exact quote provided appears verbatim in the text, where the author explicitly speculates that Chinese or Japanese tea, aided by concurrent factors, may produce particular effects in Asia that tea does not produce in Europe. This is fully supported without requiring outside knowledge or over-generalization.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.60 fail — The stance qualifier is unfaithful. The passage does not frame this as the author 'questioning' the statement. Instead, this is a speculative statement the author is proposing ('it may happen') as a possible explanation for the observed differences in tea's effects between Asia and Europe. The stance should be 'speculates' or 'suggests', not 'questions'. Additionally, the viewpoint is correct (author), sentiment is appropriate (neutral), time qualifiers are correctly null, context is appropriately empty, and the quote is accurate and verbatim. Only the stance is incorrect.
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The exact quote provided matches the text verbatim, where the author explicitly asserts that Chinese or Japanese tea, with the assistance of other things, may produce a particular effect that tea will not do in Europe. This is fully supported without any rewording or interpretation required.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the author states 'Thus, it may happen'). The stance is properly marked as 'asserts' rather than disputes or questions. The sentiment is neutral, matching the conditional, exploratory tone of the passage. The time qualifiers are all null, which is appropriate since the passage provides no temporal specification. The context is correctly empty as the passage does not restrict the claim to a particular sense or role. The quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim.

Change over time

1679
  • fails of attempt to discredit coffee