writer in the League
- excess paid at monopolists' shops is annual sum of £7,000,000 per annum ⟨compared to Brazil shop prices⟩
the sum paid for sugar at the monopolists' shops, more than it could be bought for at the Brazil shop, is £7,000,000 per annum
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The exact quote from 'a writer in the _League_' is provided: 'the sum paid for sugar at the monopolists' shops, more than it could be bought for at the Brazil shop, is £7,000,000 per annum.' The claim accurately captures the subject, predicate, object, perspective, and context from the passage without requiring outside knowledge or over-generalization.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly attributes the statement to 'a writer in the League' as stated in the passage. The stance is 'asserts' which matches the passage's presentation. The sentiment is appropriately negative given the critical context about monopolists' plundering. The time qualifier 'per annum' matches the passage's 'per annum'. The context 'compared to Brazil shop prices' is faithful to the passage's 'more than it could be bought for at the Brazil shop'. The quote appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim about the £7,000,000 annual excess.