idchkg
An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

excess water unspecified sense

concept · 1 mention

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

Frederick B. Goddard (author)

  • excess water causes soap to waste or dissolve too freely ⟨in use⟩
    assertsnegativesource: general-pg50759
    An excess of water causes soap to waste or dissolve too freely in use
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — This claim is directly stated in the passage with the exact wording: 'An excess of water causes soap to waste or dissolve too freely in use.' The subject, predicate, and object all match the source text precisely.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage does not cite a named source). The stance is correctly marked as 'asserts' - the passage states this as fact without disputing or questioning it. The sentiment is appropriately negative, reflecting the passage's framing of excess water as economically undesirable. The time qualifiers are correctly null since the passage provides no temporal restriction. The context 'in use' accurately reflects the passage's scope restriction. The quote appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.

reported

  • mottled soaps cannot be effectively applied excess water
    assertsneutralsource: general-pg50759
    It is said that these cannot be effectively applied if the soap contains an excess of water
    judge verdicts (4)
    • groundedness 0.70 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The text states 'It is said that these cannot be effectively applied if the soap contains an excess of water,' which directly matches the claim that mottled soaps with excess water cannot be effectively applied. The only minor difference is the claim specifies 'for mottled effect' while the passage is slightly less explicit about the purpose, but this is a reasonable inference from context.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.65 fail — The viewpoint qualifier is incorrect. The passage explicitly states 'It is said that these cannot be effectively applied if the soap contains an excess of water' - the use of 'It is said' indicates this is reported/attributed to unnamed others, not directly asserted by the author. The viewpoint should be 'reported' or 'attributed' rather than 'author'. This is a critical qualifier fidelity issue since the passage explicitly distances the claim from authorial assertion.
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage with the exact quote provided: 'It is said that these cannot be effectively applied if the soap contains an excess of water.' The claim accurately captures the relationship between mottled soaps, their application effectiveness, and excess water content as presented in the source text.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly marked as 'reported' since the passage uses 'It is said that' to attribute the claim. The stance 'asserts' is appropriate as the passage frames this as a reported assertion. The sentiment is neutral, matching the factual tone of the passage. The time qualifiers are all null, which is correct as the passage provides no temporal scope. The context is empty, which is appropriate as the passage restricts the claim to mottled soaps specifically but does not further differentiate senses or roles. The quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim about mottled soaps and excess water.