Hahnemann
- excessive coffee causes semilateral headache headache ⟨in persons with very excitable bodies unused to coffee⟩
If the quantity of coffee taken be immoderately great and the body be very excitable and quite unused to coffee, there occurs a semilateral headache from the upper part of the parietal bone to the base of the brain.
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. Hahnemann explicitly describes that when coffee is taken in immoderately great quantities by someone with a very excitable body unused to coffee, a semilateral headache occurs from the upper parietal bone to the base of the brain, with the exact quote provided matching the passage verbatim.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly attributes the statement to Hahnemann, the stance appropriately uses 'asserts' for a direct descriptive claim, the sentiment is neutral as befits a medical description, the time qualifiers are correctly null as the passage provides no temporal scope, the context accurately captures the conditional restrictions ('very excitable bodies' and 'quite unused to coffee'), and the quote appears verbatim and directly supports the claim about semilateral headache caused by excessive coffee in the specified conditions.
The eyes and ears suffer alike from the super-excitation of coffee.
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. Hahnemann explicitly writes 'The eyes and ears suffer alike from the super-excitation of coffee,' which directly supports the subject-predicate-object relationship that excessive coffee causes super-excitation affecting eyes and ears.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly attributes the statement to Hahnemann. The stance 'asserts' accurately reflects how the passage presents this as Hahnemann's direct claim without dispute or questioning. The sentiment is appropriately neutral as this is a clinical description. The time qualifiers are correctly null since the passage provides no temporal scope. The context is appropriately empty as the passage does not restrict the claim to a particular sense or role. The quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim about super-excitation affecting eyes and ears.