unnamed source
Fifty pounds of meat are said to be required to make one pound of Liebig's meat extract
judge verdicts (4)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'Fifty pounds of meat are said to be required to make one pound of Liebig's meat extract.' The subject, predicate, and object match the source text exactly, with no rewording or generalization required.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.60 fail — The viewpoint qualifier is unfaithful. The passage explicitly states 'Fifty pounds of meat are said to be required' (emphasis on 'are said'), which attributes this claim to unnamed others via passive voice/reported speech, not to the author asserting it directly. The viewpoint should reflect this as 'reported' or 'attributed to unnamed source' rather than 'author'. The stance should also be 'reports' rather than 'asserts' to capture the distancing language of 'are said to be.'
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'Fifty pounds of meat are said to be required to make one pound of Liebig's meat extract.' The subject, predicate, and object are all explicitly provided with identical wording, making this a perfect match with no rewording needed.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The quote is verbatim and accurate. However, there is one minor qualifier issue: the viewpoint should be "said" or "reported" rather than "unnamed source" to reflect the passage's framing that this is hearsay ("are said to be"), not a direct assertion. The stance of "asserts" is slightly imprecise—the passage presents this as a claim made by unspecified others ("are said"), not as a direct assertion by the passage itself. Sentiment and context are appropriately neutral/empty. Time qualifiers are correctly null since the passage provides no temporal information.