idchkg
An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

four days unspecified sense

concept · 1 mention

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

D. Quélus (author)

  • kernels will spoil if left in shells more than four days ⟨processing requirement⟩
    assertsneutralsource: pg24588
    If the Kernels were left in Shells more than four Days, they would sprit, or begin to grow, and be quite spoiled
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly states: 'If the Kernels were left in Shells more than four Days, they would sprit, or begin to grow, and be quite spoiled.' The claim accurately captures this requirement without adding outside knowledge or over-generalization.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as factual information about the process). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' rather than disputes or questions. The sentiment is neutral, matching the instructional tone of the passage. The time qualifiers are correctly set to null as the passage provides no specific temporal scope beyond the four-day window. The context 'processing requirement' accurately reflects that this is part of the harvesting and processing instructions. The quote is verbatim and directly supports the claim about spoilage after four days in shells.

William H. Ukers (author)

  • John Arbuckle had been ill four days four days before March 27, 1912
    assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
    he had been ill only four days
    judge verdicts (4)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'When John Arbuckle died at his Brooklyn home, March 27, 1912, he had been ill only four days.' The subject, predicate, and object are all explicitly mentioned with no rewording or interpretation required.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.60 fail — The time qualifier is unfaithful: the claim has valid_to set to 1912-03-27 (the date of Arbuckle's death), but the passage does not indicate when the illness period ended relative to his death. The passage only states 'he had been ill only four days' before noting he died on March 27, 1912, but does not explicitly mark the illness endpoint as the death date. The 'when' field should reflect the temporal reference in the passage (implicitly the four-day period prior to March 27, 1912), but valid_to should not be asserted without explicit confirmation. Additionally, 'viewpoint' should be null or reflect that the passage itself is the source, not 'author'.
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'When John Arbuckle died at his Brooklyn home, March 27, 1912, he had been ill only four days.' The subject, predicate, and object are all explicitly present with no rewording or inference required.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is highly faithful to the passage. All qualifiers are correct: viewpoint is 'author' (appropriate as the passage itself states the fact), stance is 'asserts' (the passage presents it as fact), sentiment is 'neutral' (the passage is matter-of-fact), time matches the passage's temporal scope with correct normalization to 1912-03-23, context is empty (appropriately, as the passage provides no contextual restriction), and the quote appears verbatim. Minor deduction: the 'valid_to' null value is appropriate since the passage does not specify an end date, but the phrasing of 'when' could be slightly more precise by noting the illness period rather than the time before death. Overall excellent fidelity.

Change over time

four days before March 27, 1912
  • had been ill John Arbuckle