Royal Declaration
caffez provenant des plantations et cultures des Isles Francoises de l'Amerique
judge verdicts (4)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The 1736 regulation document explicitly mentions 'caffez provenant des plantations et cultures des Isles Francoises de l'Amerique' (coffees coming from plantations and cultures of the French Islands of America), which directly supports that coffee derived from French West Indian Islands in the context of plantations and cultivation.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.50 fail — VIEWPOINT is unfaithful: the claim attributes the statement to 'author' but the passage shows this is from a 'DECLARATION DU ROY' (Royal Declaration), a named institutional/governmental source, not an author. The quote and other qualifiers (time 1736, context 'plantations and cultivation', sentiment neutral, stance asserts) are accurate, but the viewpoint should reflect the actual source: the French Royal Declaration, not a generic author attribution.
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The document from Paris, 1736 explicitly states 'Portant reglement sur les caffez provenant des plantations et cultures des Isles Francoises de l'Amerique' (concerning regulations on coffees coming from plantations and cultures of the French Islands of America), which directly establishes that coffee derives from French West Indian Islands in the context of plantations and cultivation.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The quote accurately appears verbatim in the 1736 regulation entry. Viewpoint, stance, and sentiment are appropriately identified. Context correctly specifies 'plantations and cultivation.' However, there is a minor timing issue: the claim's 'when' field is set to 1736, but the quote comes from a regulation 'Portant reglement sur les caffez provenant des plantations et cultures des Isles Francoises de l'Amerique. Paris, 1736.' While 1736 is the publication date, the passage does not explicitly state this as the effective date or the temporal scope to which the claim applies, making the time qualifier slightly presumptive rather than strictly extracted from the passage.
