idchkg
An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

Gold Coast unspecified sense

place · 4 mentions

Territory in Africa

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

  • coffee cultivated in Gold Coast 1895, 1897
    assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
    COFFEE cultivation at the Gold Coast
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The bibliography entry explicitly lists 'COFFEE cultivation at the Gold Coast' from Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew publications in 1895 and 1897, fully supporting the subject-predicate-object relationship and timeframe provided.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly identifies Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew as the source (from the bibliographic entry). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage presents this as factual information. The sentiment is neutral, matching the objective nature of the source material. The time qualifiers (1895, 1897, valid_from: 1895, valid_to: 1897) accurately reflect the publication dates cited in the bibliography. The context is appropriately empty as the passage does not restrict the claim to a particular sense or role. The quote 'COFFEE cultivation at the Gold Coast' appears verbatim in the passage and supports the claim.

William H. Ukers (author)

  • Gold Coast produced considerable coffee coffee formerly ⟨formerly⟩
    assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
    This colony formerly produced considerable coffee
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage, which explicitly states 'This colony formerly produced considerable coffee, exporting 142,000 pounds in 1896.' The passage substantiates both the claim and the timeframe indicated.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is highly faithful to the passage. Viewpoint, stance, and sentiment are all appropriate. The temporal qualifier 'formerly' correctly captures the passage's framing. The context field contains 'formerly' which is redundant (it duplicates the time qualifier) but not technically unfaithful since the passage does restrict this claim to a historical period. The quote is verbatim and supports the claim. Minor deduction only for the redundant context field; this does not rise to a material error in qualifier fidelity.

Change over time

1895, 1897
  • cultivated in coffee
formerly
  • produced considerable coffee coffee