William H. Ukers (author)
In 1900, ninety-nine firms were engaged in the green coffee importing business
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'In 1900, ninety-nine firms were engaged in the green coffee importing business (some were roasters also) in New York.' The subject, predicate, object, and temporal context all match exactly with no rewording or interpretation needed.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (implicit narrator), the stance is assertive, the sentiment is neutral, the time is accurately set to 1900, and the quote appears verbatim in the passage supporting the claim about ninety-nine firms in New York's green coffee importing business.
twenty-eight in San Francisco
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage, which explicitly states: 'In 1900, ninety-nine firms were engaged in the green coffee importing business... twenty-eight in San Francisco.' The subject, predicate, object, and temporal specification all match the passage exactly.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as factual reporting). The stance is accurately characterized as assertive. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's objective, statistical tone. The time qualifiers are correct - the passage explicitly states 'In 1900' for this figure. The context is appropriately empty since the passage provides no restriction to a specific sense or role beyond the straightforward statistical claim. The quote 'twenty-eight in San Francisco' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim about the number of green coffee importing firms in that city in 1900.
twelve in New Orleans
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'In 1900, ninety-nine firms were engaged in the green coffee importing business (some were roasters also) in New York; six in Philadelphia; twenty-eight in San Francisco; twelve in New Orleans.' The specific number of twelve firms in New Orleans in 1900 is explicitly provided.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (who presents the statistical data). The stance is appropriately marked as 'asserts' since the passage states this as fact. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's neutral, informational tone. The time is correctly specified as 1900, matching the passage's statement 'In 1900'. The context is empty, which is appropriate since the passage does not restrict the claim to any particular sense or role. The quote 'twelve in New Orleans' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.
six in Philadelphia
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'In 1900, ninety-nine firms were engaged in the green coffee importing business (some were roasters also) in New York; six in Philadelphia; twenty-eight in San Francisco; twelve in New Orleans.' The exact number of six firms in Philadelphia in 1900 is explicitly cited.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to 'author' as the passage presents a factual statement without attribution to a named source. The stance is 'asserts' which matches the declarative presentation. The sentiment is neutral, appropriate for a factual commercial statistic. The time is correctly specified as 1900, matching the passage's statement 'In 1900'. The context is empty, which is appropriate as the passage provides no additional contextual qualifier. The quote 'six in Philadelphia' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim about the number of firms in that city during 1900.
In 1920, there were two hundred and sixteen in New York
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'In 1920, there were two hundred and sixteen in New York.' This is a straightforward factual assertion with no rewording or interpretation required.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The quote is verbatim, the time (1920) is correct, the viewpoint is appropriately 'author' (the passage presents this as a factual statement without attribution to a named source), stance is 'asserts', and sentiment is neutral. The only minor note is that context is empty, which is acceptable since the passage does not restrict the claim to a particular sense or role—green coffee importing firms are discussed in their commercial context without qualification. All qualifiers are faithful to the passage.
thirty-one in San Francisco
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'In 1920, there were two hundred and sixteen in New York; thirty-one in San Francisco; fifteen in New Orleans.' The subject, predicate, object, and time period are all explicitly supported without any rewording or inference needed.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (passage presents this as factual information without attribution to a named source). The stance is properly marked as 'asserts' (the passage states this as fact). Sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's neutral, informational tone. The time qualifier correctly specifies 1920, matching the passage's statement 'In 1920, there were... thirty-one in San Francisco.' The context is appropriately empty as the passage provides no restricting context beyond the factual claim. The quote 'thirty-one in San Francisco' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.
fifteen in New Orleans
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'In 1920, there were two hundred and sixteen in New York; thirty-one in San Francisco; fifteen in New Orleans.' The subject, predicate, object, and time specification all match the passage exactly without requiring outside knowledge or over-generalization.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as factual information without attribution to a named source). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage states this as fact. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's neutral tone. The time qualifiers correctly identify 1920 as specified in the passage ('In 1920'). The context is empty, which is appropriate since the passage does not restrict this claim to a particular sense or role. The quote 'fifteen in New Orleans' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.