grinding or crushing unspecified sense

William H. Ukers (author)

• cutting rolls cut without grinding or crushing
  assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500

  to cut--and not to grind or crush--corn, wheat, or coffee

  judge verdicts (2)

  • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly describes Jules Le Page's patents as being 'on cutting rolls to cut--and not to grind or crush--corn, wheat, or coffee,' which directly supports the subject-predicate-object relationship claimed.
  • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage itself makes this assertion about Jules Le Page's cutting rolls). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage straightforwardly states the cutting rolls' function. The sentiment is neutral, matching the factual tone of the passage. The time qualifiers are correctly null since the passage does not specify when this feature became relevant beyond the patent date (which relates to the invention, not the claim itself). The context is empty, which is appropriate as there is no restricted sense or role mentioned. The quote 'to cut--and not to grind or crush--corn, wheat, or coffee' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim about the cutting rolls' function.