An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

Johnson doctor philosopher

person · 1 mention

A mad doctor philosopher known for his genius

Other senses of “Johnson”

unspecified

Connections

The concepts, people, and places this entity is most linked to by claims — node size is mention count, colour is type, dashed nodes are other senses of the same word.

JohnsonJohnson (—)wine — 3 shared claimsDavid Garrick — 2 shared claimstea — 1 shared claimwineDavid Garricktea
ConceptPerson

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

Johnson

  • Johnson is a tea drinker tea
    a hardened and shameless tea drinker
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The passage directly states that Johnson confessed to being 'a hardened and shameless tea drinker,' which precisely matches the claim that Johnson is a tea drinker. The quote is accurate and fully supported by the text.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The viewpoint (Johnson), stance (asserts), and quote ("a hardened and shameless tea drinker") are all accurate and properly attributed. The time qualifiers (all null) are appropriate since the passage does not specify when this statement was made. However, the sentiment qualifier should be "self-deprecating" or "ironic" rather than "neutral", as Johnson's use of "hardened and shameless" conveys a humorous, self-mocking tone about his tea drinking habit. The context is correctly left empty as the passage provides no restrictive context. The quote is verbatim and directly supports the claim.
  • Johnson has no objection to drinking wine in moderation wine ⟨moderation⟩
    Sir, I have no objection to a man's drinking wine if he can do it in moderation
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. Johnson explicitly says 'Sir, I have no objection to a man's drinking wine if he can do it in moderation,' which perfectly matches the subject-predicate-object relationship presented in the claim.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly attributes the statement to Johnson himself. The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as Johnson is making a direct statement. The sentiment is neutral, matching the matter-of-fact tone of his response. The time is correctly set to null as no specific temporal information is provided in the passage. The context 'moderation' accurately reflects the restriction Johnson places on his statement. The quote appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.
  • Johnson finds himself apt to go to excess in wine wine
    assertsnegativesource: coffee-pg28500
    I find myself apt to go to excess in it
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. Johnson explicitly states 'I find myself apt to go to excess in it' when referring to wine, and the passage provides the full context of this confession to Boswell.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly attributes the statement to Johnson (not 'author'). The stance is correctly marked as 'asserts' since Johnson is making a direct statement. The sentiment 'negative' appropriately reflects Johnson's concern about excess. The time is correctly set to null since the passage provides no specific temporal information. The context is appropriately empty as the passage doesn't restrict this to a particular sense or role. The quote 'I find myself apt to go to excess in it' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.
  • Johnson chose not to return to drinking wine after illness wine after having been for some time without it, on account of illness ⟨after illness⟩
    I thought it better not to return to it
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. Johnson explicitly states: 'I find myself apt to go to excess in it and therefore, after having been for some time without it, on account of illness, I thought it better not to return to it.' This directly confirms that Johnson chose not to return to drinking wine after his illness due to his tendency toward excess.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The viewpoint, stance, sentiment, time qualifier, and context are all appropriate. The quote is verbatim and supports the claim. Minor deduction: the quote 'I thought it better not to return to it' is not the complete relevant quote—the fuller relevant quote is 'I find myself apt to go to excess in it and therefore, after having been for some time without it, on account of illness, I thought it better not to return to it,' which provides more complete context for Johnson's reasoning. However, the partial quote does appear verbatim and accurately supports the claim as stated.

William H. Ukers (author)

  • David Garrick was pupil of johnson Johnson in his early days ⟨in Johnson's early days⟩
    In his early days Johnson had David Garrick as an unwilling pupil
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'In his early days Johnson had David Garrick as an unwilling pupil.' This explicitly confirms that Garrick was Johnson's pupil during Johnson's early days, matching all elements of the claim.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — Minor issue with viewpoint: the claim uses 'author' but the passage presents this as general historical fact/anecdote without attribution to a named source. The passage structure ('Patient delving into Johnsoniana...') suggests these are established biographical accounts rather than the author's personal assertion. However, this is a marginal distinction since the passage does present the information as fact. All other qualifiers are faithful: the quote is verbatim, the time qualifier 'in his early days' matches the passage, the context appropriately reflects the historical period, and the sentiment is neutral. The relationship (unwilling pupil) is accurately captured.
  • David Garrick mimicked johnson's grimaces to entertain Johnson
    he was wont to "put the table in a roar" by mimicking the doctor's grimaces
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage, which explicitly states that Garrick 'was wont to "put the table in a roar" by mimicking the doctor's grimaces.' The predicate accurately captures this behavior of mimicking Johnson's grimaces to entertain others.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as narrative fact, not attributed to a named source). The stance is 'asserts' which matches the passage's declarative presentation. The sentiment is neutral, appropriate for a factual anecdote. The time qualifiers are all null, which is correct since the passage provides only vague temporal markers ('after the actor had become famous') without specific dates. The context is empty, which is appropriate as there are no restrictive contextual qualifications needed. The quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim about Garrick mimicking Johnson's grimaces to entertain (put the table in a roar).

Change over time

after having been for some time without it, on account of illness
  • chose not to return to drinking wine after illness wine
in his early days
  • was pupil of johnson David Garrick