myrtle plant

concept · 8 mentions

a variety of coffee plant distinguished from arabica by larger leaves and smaller flower corolla

Connections

The concepts, people, and places this entity is most linked to by claims — node size is mention count, colour is type, dashed nodes are other senses of the same word.

ConceptPlace

Defining properties

is variety called myrtle ⟨coffee plant⟩
is widely grown in Mexico
is distinguished from arabica by larger leaf and smaller flower corolla
is hardier than arabica
thrives at elevation of 500 to 3,000 feet
is mostly cultivated in Cordoba district
is milder than Ruscus
have properties ascribed for expulsion of somniferous vapours somniferous vapours ⟨true myrtle⟩
removes languid state of hard students ⟨true myrtle⟩
contains stalks resembling myrtle stalks Bohea tea
may be adulterated with Bohea tea
is a kind of clove tree

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

William H. Ukers (author)

myrtle is variety called myrtle ⟨coffee plant⟩
assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
The other variety is called the "myrtle"
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly says 'The other variety is called the "myrtle"', which perfectly matches the subject-predicate-object structure of the claim.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as general information). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage states the fact directly. Sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's objective tone. Time qualifiers are correctly null as the passage provides no temporal scope. Context 'coffee plant' is appropriate given the passage discusses coffee varieties. The quote appears verbatim and supports the claim accurately.
myrtle is widely grown in Mexico
assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
is widely grown
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 0.70 pass — The passage states 'The other variety is called the "myrtle" and is widely grown' in Mexico, which directly supports the claim. The minor rewording from the passage's phrasing does not diminish the groundedness of the assertion.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as a direct statement, not attributed to a named source). The stance is accurately captured as 'asserts' (a straightforward factual claim). The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's tone. The time qualifiers are appropriately null, as the passage provides no temporal scope. The context is empty, which is correct as the passage does not restrict this claim to a particular sense or role. The quote 'is widely grown' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim about the myrtle variety.
myrtle is distinguished from arabica by larger leaf and smaller flower corolla
assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
It is distinguished from _arabica_ by the larger leaf of the tree and by the smaller corolla of the flower
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The exact quote provided matches the text, confirming that the myrtle variety is distinguished from arabica by the larger leaf of the tree and the smaller corolla of the flower.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as the author's direct statement, not attributed to a named source). The stance is correctly marked as 'asserts' - the passage makes a straightforward claim without disputing or questioning. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's objective, descriptive tone. The time qualifiers are all null, which is correct since the passage provides no temporal scope for this botanical distinction. The context is empty, which is appropriate as the passage does not restrict this claim to a particular sense or role. The quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim about the myrtle's distinguishing characteristics.
myrtle is hardier than arabica
assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
It is a hardier plant than the _arabica_
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — This claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly says 'It is a hardier plant than the _arabica_' when describing the myrtle variety, making this a fully supported assertion.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as factual information without attributing it to a named source). The stance is correctly marked as 'asserts' since the passage states this as a fact. The sentiment is neutral, matching the objective tone of the botanical comparison. The time qualifiers are all null, which is correct since the passage provides no temporal scope. The context is empty, which is appropriate since no specific sense or role restriction applies. The quote 'It is a hardier plant than the _arabica_' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.
myrtle thrives at elevation of 500 to 3,000 feet
assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
thriving at an elevation of from 500 to 3,000 feet above sea-level
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly says of the 'myrtle' variety: 'it will stand the higher temperature of low altitudes, thriving at an elevation of from 500 to 3,000 feet above sea-level.' The subject, predicate, and object are all accurately extracted from the source material.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as general knowledge about the myrtle variety). The stance is accurately marked as 'asserts' - the passage states this as fact without dispute or questioning. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's objective, descriptive tone. The time qualifiers are appropriately null since the passage provides no temporal scope. The context is empty, which is correct as the passage discusses the myrtle as a coffee variety without restricting it to a specific sense or role. The quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim about the myrtle's elevation range.
myrtle is mostly cultivated in Cordoba district
assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
Mostly it is cultivated in the Cordoba district
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'Mostly it is cultivated in the Cordoba district.' The passage explicitly identifies 'it' (the myrtle variety) as being mostly cultivated in the Cordoba district, making this claim fully supported without requiring any outside knowledge or over-generalization.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (passage states this as fact without attribution to a named source). The stance is correctly marked as 'asserts' (presented as factual claim). Sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's straightforward presentation. Time qualifiers are correctly null since the passage provides no temporal scope. Context is appropriately empty as the passage makes no sense distinctions. The quote 'Mostly it is cultivated in the Cordoba district' appears verbatim and directly supports the claim about myrtle coffee cultivation location.

Simon Paulli (author)

myrtle removes languid state of hard students ⟨true myrtle⟩
assertspositivesource: general-pg53027
removing the languid State of hard Students; these Properties are more frequently ascribed to the true _Myrtle_
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly asserts that the property of 'removing the languid State of hard Students' is 'more frequently ascribed to the true _Myrtle_,' which directly supports the subject-predicate-object relationship without requiring outside knowledge or over-generalization.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.80 pass — The quote is accurate and the context 'true myrtle' is correct. The predicate 'removes' is faithful to the passage's framing. However, the stance qualifier is slightly unfaithful: the passage does not assert that myrtle removes this state as a definitive fact, but rather states these properties are 'more frequently ascribed to the true Myrtle than to Betony' - a comparative claim about attribution rather than a direct assertion. The stance should reflect 'ascribed' or 'attributed' rather than 'asserts'. All other qualifiers (viewpoint: author, sentiment: positive, time: null, context: true myrtle) are faithful.
Bohea tea contains stalks resembling myrtle stalks myrtle
assertsneutralsource: general-pg53027
in turning over the Bohea Tea, contained in the other Box, I found three Stalks, so nearly resembling those of the Myrtle
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The author explicitly reports finding three stalks in the Bohea Tea that closely resemble myrtle stalks, using the exact quote provided as evidence. This observation is presented as a first-hand discovery without embellishment or generalization.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (first-person 'I found'). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' rather than 'disputes' or 'questions', matching the author's direct observational claim. The sentiment is neutral, reflecting the factual presentation. The time qualifiers are correctly null as the passage provides no specific temporal information. The context is appropriately empty as there are no restrictive sense qualifications needed. The quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim about Bohea tea containing stalks resembling myrtle stalks.
Bohea tea may be adulterated with myrtle
questionsnegativesource: general-pg53027
This, in so dubious a Case, is a pretty strong Argument, that Bohea Tea is adulterated with Myrtle
judge verdicts (4)
- groundedness 0.70 pass — The passage directly states this claim in the sentence: 'This, in so dubious a Case, is a pretty strong Argument, that _Bohea Tea_ is adulterated with _Myrtle_.' The author presents this as a conclusion based on finding myrtle-like stalks in the bohea tea samples, though he acknowledges the evidence is circumstantial ('dubious Case') rather than definitive.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.65 fail — The stance qualifier is unfaithful. The passage does not assert this as fact but rather frames it as suspicion: 'This, in so dubious a Case, is a pretty strong Argument, that Bohea Tea is adulterated with Myrtle' and 'suspects that the Leaves of some other Plant are often sold in their Stead.' The stance should be 'questions' or 'suspects' rather than 'asserts.' The viewpoint is correct as 'author,' the sentiment is appropriately negative, and the time/context qualifiers are acceptable. The quote is present verbatim but is preceded by hedging language ('in so dubious a Case') that the claim does not capture.
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The author explicitly provides the quoted text as evidence that Bohea Tea may be adulterated with Myrtle, supporting this with the discovery of three stalks in the Bohea Tea box that closely resembled Myrtle stalks.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — The claim is mostly faithful to the passage. Strengths: the quote is verbatim, the time qualifier is correctly null, the context is appropriately empty, and the sentiment (negative) matches the passage's framing of adulteration as problematic. Minor issue: the viewpoint should be verified as 'author' since the passage is written in first person by the author making this observation directly, not attributing it to a named external source. The stance qualifier 'questions' is slightly imprecise—the passage presents this more as a tentative conclusion ('may be justly accounted', 'pretty strong Argument') rather than explicitly questioning the claim. However, the use of 'may be' in the quote itself does reflect the tentative, questioning nature, so this is acceptable. Overall fidelity is high.

Marcellus Virgilius

Myrtle is milder than Ruscus
assertsneutralsource: general-pg53027
the _Myrtle_ is milder than the _Ruscus_
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — This claim is directly stated in the passage. The exact quote 'the _Myrtle_ is milder than the _Ruscus_' appears verbatim in the passage, attributed to Marcellus Virgilius in his Commentary on Dioscorides, Book 1, Chapter 132, as cited by the author.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly attributes the statement to Marcellus Virgilius, as indicated by 'Thus _Marcellus Virgilius_, in _Comment. in Dioscorid. Lib. 1. Cap. 132._ makes a great Difference between them in the following Passage:' The stance 'asserts' is appropriate for a direct statement. The sentiment is neutral, matching the factual comparative tone. Time qualifiers are correctly null as the passage provides no temporal information. Context is appropriately empty as the passage does not restrict this claim to a specific sense or role. The quote appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim about the mildness comparison.

Robert O. Fielding (author)

clove tree is a kind of myrtle
assertsneutralsource: spices-pg60192
a kind of myrtle
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'Cloves are dried, unopened calyces or flower buds of the clove tree, Caryophyllus aromaticus, a kind of myrtle.' The exact phrase 'a kind of myrtle' appears as a descriptor of the clove tree.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage states this as a factual assertion without attribution to a named source). The stance is 'asserts' which matches the declarative nature of the statement. The sentiment is neutral, appropriate for a botanical description. The time qualifiers are all null, which is correct since the passage provides no temporal scope. The context is empty, which is appropriate as the passage does not restrict this claim to a particular sense or period. The quote 'a kind of myrtle' appears verbatim in the passage and accurately supports the claim that the clove tree is a kind of myrtle.

passage author

myrtle have properties ascribed for expulsion of somniferous vapours somniferous vapours ⟨true myrtle⟩
assertsneutralsource: general-pg53027
these Properties are more frequently ascribed to the true _Myrtle_, than to _Betony_
judge verdicts (4)
- groundedness 0.70 pass — The passage states that the expulsion of somniferous vapours is 'more frequently ascribed to the true _Myrtle_, than to _Betony_', which directly supports the claim that myrtle expels somniferous vapours, though the attribution is presented as something ascribed to it rather than definitively proven.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.60 fail — The quote is incomplete and does not support the predicate 'expels'. The passage states that expulsion of somniferous vapours is 'ascribed to' myrtle, not that myrtle 'expels' them - these are different claims about attribution versus direct action. The quote provided cuts off mid-sentence and doesn't actually demonstrate the claimed relationship between myrtle and somniferous vapours. Additionally, the perspective viewpoint should be 'passage author' or similar rather than generic 'author' since this is an attributed claim about what is 'asserted' in the text.
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly asserts that properties related to 'Expulsion of somniferous Vapours' are 'more frequently ascribed to the true _Myrtle_, than to _Betony_', which directly supports the claim that myrtle has properties ascribed for expulsion of somniferous vapours.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly identified as 'passage author' (the passage asserts this claim directly). The stance 'asserts' is appropriate as the passage presents this as a factual assertion. The sentiment is neutral, matching the clinical, informational tone. The time qualifiers are correctly null as the passage provides no temporal scope. The context 'true myrtle' accurately reflects the passage's specification of 'the true _Myrtle_' and correctly distinguishes it from other potential senses. The quote is verbatim and directly supports the claim about the ascription of properties related to expulsion of somniferous vapours.