Nancy Shippen unspecified sense

person · 16 mentions

A Philadelphian diarist whose journal entries from 1783-1786 document tea-hour activities

Connections

The concepts, people, and places this entity is most linked to by claims — node size is mention count, colour is type, dashed nodes are other senses of the same word.

ConceptPersonPlace

Defining properties

spent afternoon in chit-chat and drank tea ⟨Philadelphia social gathering⟩
held tea gathering with Mr Jones, Mr Du Ponceau, Mr Hollingsworth ⟨America⟩
received sketch and note from beau depicting tea company in parlor ⟨American parlors⟩
sat before tea table ⟨tea party⟩
enclosed sketch in letter to Louis Guillaume Otto ⟨Philadelphia⟩

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

Nancy Shippen

Nancy Shippen spent afternoon in chit-chat and drank tea March 11, 1785 ⟨Philadelphia social gathering⟩
assertspositivesource: tea-pg46775
drank a very good dish of Tea together
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. Nancy Shippen's journal entry from March 11, 1785, explicitly states that she spent the afternoon in 'agreable chit-chat manner' and 'drank a very good dish of Tea together,' matching the claim exactly with the provided quote.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to Nancy Shippen (from her journal entry). The stance 'asserts' is appropriate as she is recounting her own experience. The sentiment 'positive' is well-supported by her description of 'the most agreable chit-chat manner' and 'a very good dish of Tea.' The time qualifiers are precise and accurate (March 11, 1785). The context appropriately reflects a Philadelphia social gathering. The quote is verbatim from the passage. Minor deduction: the context could be more specific—it's not just a gathering but a tea hour social gathering—but the current framing is acceptable and not unfaithful.
Nancy Shippen held tea gathering with Mr Jones, Mr Du Ponceau, Mr Hollingsworth January 18, 1784 ⟨America⟩
assertspositivesource: tea-pg46775
honor'd with the Company of M^r Jones (a gentleman lately from Europe) M^r Du Ponceau, & M^r Hollingsworth at Tea
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. Nancy Shippen's journal entry for January 18, 1784 explicitly states she was 'honor'd with the Company of M^r Jones (a gentleman lately from Europe) M^r Du Ponceau, & M^r Hollingsworth at Tea,' confirming she held a tea gathering with these three men on that specific date in America.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly attributes the statement to Nancy Shippen (from her journal entry). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as she describes the event. The sentiment is positive, matching her language of being 'honor'd' and spending an 'agreable Even^g'. The time is precise to January 18, 1784, as explicitly stated in the passage. The context 'America' is consistent with the passage's discussion of teatime in America. The quote appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim about the tea gathering and attendees.

Louis Guillaume Otto

Nancy Shippen sat before tea table ⟨tea party⟩
assertsneutralsource: tea-pg46775
Miss N^{ancy} [Shippen] before the tea table
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The 'Explication' explicitly notes '_C._ Miss N^{ancy} [Shippen] before the tea table,' which precisely matches the subject, predicate, and object of the claim.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — Claim is well-supported with faithful qualifiers. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to Louis Guillaume Otto. The stance of 'asserts' is appropriate for a descriptive sketch. Sentiment is neutral as the passage presents factual placement information without evaluative language. Time qualifiers are correctly null as the passage provides only an approximate date ('about 1780') rather than a specific valid timeframe. Context 'tea party' is appropriate and supported by the passage's reference to 'tea-party participants' and the 'tea table'. The quote is verbatim from the Explication. Minor note: the quote could be slightly more complete ('_C._ Miss N^{ancy} [Shippen] before the tea table'), but the provided quote accurately captures the essential claim and appears verbatim in the source material.

Rodris Roth (author)

Nancy Shippen received sketch and note from beau depicting tea company in parlor 18th century ⟨American parlors⟩
assertsneutralsource: tea-pg46775
Evidence of such furniture placement in American parlors is recorded in a sketch and note Nancy Shippen received from one of her beaus, who wrote in part: ... this evening I passed before Your house and seeing Company in the parlour I peep'd through the Window and saw a considerable Tea Company, of which by their situation I could only distinguish four persons.
judge verdicts (4)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly states that 'Evidence of such furniture placement in American parlors is recorded in a sketch and note Nancy Shippen received from one of her beaus,' and the accompanying quote demonstrates that this sketch depicted a tea company in a parlor. The claim accurately captures what the passage explicitly asserts.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.60 fail — The viewpoint qualifier is incorrect. The passage does not attribute this statement to a named source - it is the author's own assertion about evidence. The claim should use viewpoint: null or 'author' is acceptable only if treating the passage writer as the source, but the claim format suggests attribution to a named source, which is not present. Additionally, the quote provided ends mid-sentence and does not include the full supporting text ('who wrote in part:' and the sketch content that follows are part of the evidence). The quote should either be the complete sentence or more accurately represent what supports the claim about the sketch depicting a tea company.
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The text explicitly states that Nancy Shippen 'received from one of her beaus' a 'sketch and note' depicting a tea company in a parlor, with the quoted portion confirming the beau observed and described the scene through the window.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — The viewpoint should be 'passage' or 'historian' rather than 'author' - the claim documents historical evidence recorded by the passage/source material, not a direct authorial assertion. All other qualifiers are faithful: the stance is 'asserts', sentiment is neutral, time is correctly set to 18th century (1701-1800), context appropriately specifies 'American parlors', and the quote is verbatim and supports the claim. The minor viewpoint imprecision results in a deduction from perfect score, but does not prevent passing.

passage

Louis Guillaume Otto enclosed sketch in letter to Nancy Shippen about 1780 ⟨Philadelphia⟩
assertsneutralsource: tea-pg46775
A sketch by Louis Guillaume Otto that was enclosed in a letter to Nancy Shippen of Philadelphia about 1780
judge verdicts (4)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The text explicitly states that Louis Guillaume Otto created 'A sketch...that was enclosed in a letter to Nancy Shippen of Philadelphia about 1780,' confirming all key elements: the creator, the recipient, the time period, and the context.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.60 fail — The viewpoint qualifier is incorrect. The passage does not attribute this statement to a named source; rather, it is the passage itself (a caption/illustration note) making the claim. The claim uses 'viewpoint: "author"' which implies the original passage author is the source, but the actual source here is the caption/document itself. The viewpoint should be null or should reflect that this is from the passage's own narration, not from a named external source. All other qualifiers (stance, sentiment, time, context) are faithful to the passage.
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The passage explicitly describes 'A sketch by Louis Guillaume Otto that was enclosed in a letter to Nancy Shippen of Philadelphia about 1780,' which matches all elements of the subject-predicate-object relationship and temporal/contextual details provided in the claim.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the passage itself (the source material), the stance appropriately characterizes the passage as asserting this fact, sentiment is neutral as the passage is descriptive, the temporal qualifier 'about 1780' is exactly as stated in the passage with normalized dates (1775-1785) consistent with 'about 1780', context correctly identifies Philadelphia as the recipient's location, and the quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim.

Change over time

18th century

received sketch and note from beau depicting tea company in parlor

about 1780

enclosed sketch in letter to Louis Guillaume Otto

January 18, 1784

held tea gathering with Mr Jones, Mr Du Ponceau, Mr Hollingsworth

March 11, 1785

spent afternoon in chit-chat and drank tea