An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

Nicholas Upshall unspecified sense

person · 1 mention

Quaker innkeeper

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

William H. Ukers (author)

  • Nicholas Upshall, the Quaker
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'the Red Lyon, which was opened in 1637 by Nicholas Upshall, the Quaker.' The passage explicitly identifies Nicholas Upshall as a Quaker with no ambiguity or rewording needed.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage identifies Upshall as 'the Quaker' without attributing this to a named source). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage states this as fact. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's neutral tone. The time qualifiers are correctly null as the passage provides no temporal scope for this characteristic. The context is empty as appropriate since the passage gives no restricting sense or role. The quote 'Nicholas Upshall, the Quaker' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.
  • Nicholas Upshall hanged for trying to bribe jailer ⟨to pass food to starving Quakeresses in jail⟩
    later was hanged for trying to bribe a jailer to pass some food into the jail to two Quakeresses who were starving within
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly says Nicholas Upshall 'was hanged for trying to bribe a jailer to pass some food into the jail to two Quakeresses who were starving within,' which matches all elements of the claim including subject, predicate, object, and context.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage itself makes the assertion, not a named source). The stance is 'asserts' as the passage presents this as fact, not a dispute. The sentiment is neutral, matching the factual tone of the passage. The time qualifiers are all null, which is appropriate since the passage provides no specific date for the hanging. The context accurately reflects the passage's explanation. The quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim. No deductions warranted.