An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

No. 8 to No. 1 unspecified sense

concept · 1 mention

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

New York Coffee and Sugar Exchange, Inc.

  • coffee acceptable grades No. 8 to No. 1 ⟨futures contract; excludes grades below No. 8⟩
    The coffee to be of any grade, from No. 8 to No. 1 inclusive (no coffee to grade below No. 8)
    judge verdicts (4)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly specifies 'The coffee to be of any grade, from No. 8 to No. 1 inclusive (no coffee to grade below No. 8)', which directly supports that acceptable grades range from No. 8 to No. 1.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.60 fail — VIEWPOINT QUALIFIER UNFAITHFUL: The claim attributes the statement to 'author', but the passage is a standardized contract form from the New York Coffee and Sugar Exchange, Inc., not authored by an identifiable individual. The viewpoint should reflect this institutional/regulatory source rather than 'author'. Additionally, CONTEXT QUALIFIER ISSUE: While 'quality specification' is reasonable, the passage frames this within a specific contractual/commercial context (futures contract terms) that should be more precisely captured. The quote is verbatim and accurate, time qualifiers are appropriately null, stance is correct as 'asserts', and sentiment is neutral.
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly specifies 'The coffee to be of any grade, from No. 8 to No. 1 inclusive (no coffee to grade below No. 8),' which perfectly matches the claim that acceptable grades are No. 8 to No. 1, excluding grades below No. 8.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The quote is verbatim and accurately reflects the acceptable grades. Qualifiers are appropriate: viewpoint, stance, and sentiment all match the passage's framing. The context correctly identifies the futures contract setting and the exclusion clause. Minor deduction: the viewpoint attribution to 'New York Coffee and Sugar Exchange, Inc.' is slightly imprecise—the passage presents this as the contract's governing body and rule-setter rather than the direct source making this assertion. The contract itself (presented as a broker's form) establishes these grade requirements. This is a minor distinction that does not substantially impact fidelity, as the Exchange's rules do govern the contract. All other qualifiers are sound.