author
- coffee cultivation spread to other parts of the world as demand grew, after the end of the 17th century
as demand grew, cultivation spread to other parts of the world
judge verdicts (4)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — This claim is directly stated in the passage: 'as demand grew, cultivation spread to other parts of the world.' The exact predicate and object match the source text with only neutral rewording of the subject reference.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.60 fail — Multiple qualifier issues: (1) VIEWPOINT: The passage attributes this statement to Wikipedia/the author via the history text, so 'author' is acceptable, but the claim's attribution is implicit rather than explicit - this is borderline acceptable. (2) TIME: The passage does not specify when cultivation spread to other parts of the world generally - it only provides specific examples (1720 for Martinique, 1788 for Saint-Domingue). Setting valid_from to '1700' is unsupported by the passage, which only says this spreading occurred 'after the end of the 17th century' and 'as demand grew' in the context of the 1700s examples. The time qualifier should either be null or marked as approximate/uncertain, not given a specific year. This is the primary violation.
- groundedness 1.00 pass — This claim is directly stated in the passage: 'as demand grew, cultivation spread to other parts of the world.' The exact wording from the passage is used, and the temporal context (after the end of the 17th century) is also explicitly provided in the preceding sentence.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is highly faithful to the passage. The quote is verbatim, viewpoint is correctly attributed to 'author' (Wikipedia), stance is 'asserts' which matches the passage's straightforward assertion, and sentiment is neutral. The temporal qualifier is largely accurate—the passage states this occurred 'as demand grew' after 'the end of the 17th century,' which aligns with the claim's 'when' field. Context is appropriately empty. Minor note: the 'when' field uses slightly interpretive phrasing ('as demand grew, after') rather than the passage's sequential structure ('Up to the end of the 17th century...but as demand grew'), but this is a reasonable normalization and does not materially misrepresent the temporal scope.