plague unspecified sense

event · 5 mentions

A disease ravaging Mocha that Omar attempts to cure through prayer

Other senses of “plague”

Connections

The concepts, people, and places this entity is most linked to by claims — node size is mention count, colour is type, dashed nodes are other senses of the same word.

ConceptPersonPlace

Defining properties

is ravaged by Mocha
falls ill with daughter of the King of Mocha
writes treatise on coffee's use against plague Richard Bradley
would have been recommended against coffee

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

William H. Ukers (author)

Mocha is ravaged by plague
assertsnegativesource: coffee-pg28500
The beautiful village of Mocha was then ravaged by the plague
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The text explicitly states 'The beautiful village of Mocha was then ravaged by the plague,' which directly matches the subject-predicate-object relationship (Mocha is ravaged by plague).
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage is narrative text, not attributed to a named source). The stance is correctly marked as 'asserts' - the passage states this as fact within the narrative. The sentiment 'negative' appropriately matches the connotation of 'ravaged by the plague'. The time qualifiers are correctly null since the passage provides no specific temporal indicators. The context is appropriately empty as no sense restriction applies. The quote is verbatim and directly supports the claim.
daughter of the King of Mocha falls ill with plague
assertsnegativesource: coffee-pg28500
the daughter of the King of Mocha fell ill
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The text explicitly states 'the daughter of the King of Mocha fell ill' during the plague that was ravaging Mocha, establishing both the subject and the object of the predicate without requiring outside knowledge or over-generalization.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (narrator) rather than a named source. The stance is properly 'asserts' as the passage states the fact directly. The sentiment is 'negative' which matches the connotation of illness. The time qualifiers are all null, which is correct since the passage provides no specific temporal information. The context is appropriately empty as the passage does not restrict this to a particular sense or role. The quote 'the daughter of the King of Mocha fell ill' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim about her falling ill with plague (the plague is established as ravaging the village in the preceding sentence).
Richard Bradley writes treatise on coffee's use against plague plague
assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
Another (Richard Bradley), in his treatise concerning its use with regard to the plague
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The passage directly states that Richard Bradley wrote 'his treatise concerning its use with regard to the plague,' which fully supports the claim that Richard Bradley writes a treatise on coffee's use against plague.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.70 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to Richard Bradley (not 'author'), stance is 'asserts' which matches the passage's presentation, sentiment is neutral which is appropriate, time qualifiers are correctly null since no specific date is given for Bradley's treatise, context is empty which is acceptable, and the quote appears verbatim in the passage. All qualifiers are faithful to the passage's framing.

Richard Bradley

coffee would have been recommended against plague if its qualities had been fully known in 1665
assertspositivesource: coffee-pg28500
if its qualities had been fully known in 1665, "Dr. Hodges and other learned men of that time would have recommended it."
judge verdicts (4)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. Richard Bradley's statement is quoted verbatim: 'if its qualities had been fully known in 1665, "Dr. Hodges and other learned men of that time would have recommended it."' This directly establishes that Bradley believed coffee would have been recommended against plague if its qualities had been known in 1665.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.50 fail — The viewpoint and quote are correct (Richard Bradley is properly attributed), and the sentiment is appropriate (positive). However, the stance is incorrect: the passage does not frame this as Bradley 'questioning' anything. Rather, Bradley is making a hypothetical counterfactual claim about what would have happened if coffee's qualities had been known earlier. The stance should be null or 'speculates' rather than 'questions'. Additionally, the time qualifier is problematic: Bradley is speaking about a hypothetical scenario regarding 1665, but he is not making a claim valid in 1665 itself—he's making a counterfactual claim that would apply if conditions had been different. The 'when' should reflect that this is a hypothetical conditional claim, not a factual claim about 1665.
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. Richard Bradley is explicitly quoted as saying that if coffee's qualities had been fully known in 1665, Dr. Hodges and other learned men would have recommended it against the plague. The passage accurately represents his conditional assertion about coffee's potential recommendation.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. Viewpoint correctly attributes the statement to Richard Bradley. Stance 'asserts' is appropriate for his treatise claim. Sentiment 'positive' correctly reflects the beneficial implication. Time qualifier accurately captures the conditional temporal framing ('if its qualities had been fully known in 1665'). Quote is verbatim and supports the claim. Minor deduction: context is empty when it could note this concerns coffee's use 'with regard to the plague' per the passage ('in his treatise concerning its use with regard to the plague'), though this is not strictly required since the plague is already specified in the object. Overall, qualifiers are faithful.

Change over time

if its qualities had been fully known in 1665

would have been recommended against coffee