idchkg
An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

red soil soil type

concept · 2 mentions

A class of soil generally found in the mountains of Porto Rico

Connections

The concepts, people, and places this entity is most linked to by claims — node size is mention count, colour is type, dashed nodes are other senses of the same word.

red soilblack soil — 2 shared claimsmountains — 1 shared claim30 to 50 feet — 1 shared claimlimestone — 1 shared claimblack soilmountains30 to 50 feetlimestone
ConceptPlace

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

George M. Rolph (author)

  • red soil is generally found in mountains ⟨Porto Rico⟩
    assertsneutralsource: sugar-pg73616
    the red soil, generally found in the mountains
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'the red soil, generally found in the mountains' is an exact match to the text, making it fully supported without any rewording or inference required.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as factual description). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage states this factually without dispute. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's objective tone. The time qualifiers are all null, which is correct since the passage provides no temporal information. The context 'Porto Rico' is appropriate as the passage explicitly discusses Porto Rico's soil classifications. The quote 'the red soil, generally found in the mountains' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.
  • red soil is of great depth 30 to 50 feet ⟨Cuba⟩
    assertspositivesource: sugar-pg73616
    The red is generally of great depth, from 30 to 50 feet
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly says 'The red is generally of great depth, from 30 to 50 feet,' which matches the subject, predicate, and object of the claim without any rewording or interpretation needed.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (implied narrator), the stance is 'asserts' which matches the declarative nature of the passage, the sentiment of 'positive' is appropriate given the characterization of red soil as productive and of great depth, the time qualifiers are correctly null since the passage provides no temporal information, the context 'Cuba' is explicitly stated in the passage, and the quote is verbatim and directly supports the claim about the depth of red soil.
  • red soil rests on limestone ⟨Cuba⟩
    assertsneutralsource: sugar-pg73616
    rests on a stratum of free limestone
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'The red is generally of great depth, from 30 to 50 feet, and rests on a stratum of free limestone.' This is an exact match with the provided quote, fully supporting the subject-predicate-object relationship in the context of Cuban soil.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (implicit narrator of the descriptive text). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage makes a factual statement. Sentiment is neutral, matching the objective descriptive tone. The time qualifiers are correctly null since the passage provides no temporal information. The context 'Cuba' is accurate and appropriate. The quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim about red soil resting on limestone.
  • black soil is generally not so deep as red soil red soil ⟨Cuba⟩
    assertsneutralsource: sugar-pg73616
    as a general rule is not so deep as the red soil
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly says the black soil 'as a general rule is not so deep as the red soil,' which exactly matches the predicate of the claim.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as general descriptive information without naming a specific source). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage states this as factual description. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's objective tone. The time qualifiers are all null, which is correct since the passage provides no temporal scope. The context 'Cuba' is accurate and necessary. The quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim. The claim accurately represents the passage's comparison of black and red soil depths in Cuba.
  • black soil costs double to cultivate compared to red soil red soil ⟨Cuba⟩
    assertsnegativesource: sugar-pg73616
    the cost of cultivation is double that of working the red soil
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly states 'the cost of cultivation is double that of working the red soil' when referring to the black soil, making this a fully supported assertion with no added outside knowledge or over-generalization.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.95 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (no named source in passage), stance is 'asserts' which matches the passage's straightforward presentation, sentiment as 'negative' is appropriate given the context of increased cost burden, time qualifiers are correctly null as the passage provides no temporal scope, context 'Cuba' matches the passage's focus, and the quote appears verbatim and directly supports the claim. Minor deduction (0.05) for 'sentiment: negative' being somewhat interpretive—the passage presents a factual cost comparison rather than explicitly negative framing, though the context of higher cost is reasonably characterized as negative.