William H. Ukers (author)
which can be accurately regulated
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'an air current of ample power which can be accurately regulated.' The subject (air current), predicate (can be accurately regulated), and object (regulation) are all explicitly present in the text with the exact quoted phrase provided.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage itself makes the assertion without naming a specific source). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage states this as fact. The sentiment is neutral/positive, consistent with the technical description. The time qualifiers are correctly null as no temporal scope is provided. The context is appropriately empty as the passage discusses the air current in a general technical sense without restricting it to a particular sense or role beyond the stoner mechanism. The quote appears verbatim in the passage and accurately supports the claim about the air current's regulation capability.