Roubiliac unspecified sense

person · 7 mentions

A notable painter or sculptor who frequented Slaughter's

Connections

The concepts, people, and places this entity is most linked to by claims — node size is mention count, colour is type, dashed nodes are other senses of the same word.

PersonPlace

Defining properties

was often found at Slaughter's ⟨early life⟩
found and returned to sir edward walpole the pocket-book
was eastern neighbour of Old Slaughter's
promised to patronize Sir Edward Walpole
faithfully performed promise to patronize Sir Edward Walpole
was very intimate with Ware

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

William H. Ukers (author)

Roubiliac was often found at Slaughter's early life ⟨early life⟩
assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
Roubiliac was often to be found at Slaughter's in early life
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage with the exact quote: 'Roubiliac was often to be found at Slaughter's in early life.' All elements (subject, predicate, object, and temporal context) are explicitly supported by the text without any rewording or outside knowledge required.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — The claim is mostly faithful to the passage. The quote is verbatim and accurate. The viewpoint, stance, and sentiment are correct. However, there is a minor issue with the context qualifier: the claim includes 'context': 'early life', but context should only be specified when the passage restricts the claim to a specific sense, role, or period that distinguishes it from other uses. Here, 'early life' is already captured in the temporal qualifier 'when': 'early life', making the context field redundant. The context field should be empty or null when the temporal information already covers the restriction. This is a formatting inconsistency rather than a factual error.
Roubiliac was eastern neighbour of Old Slaughter's
assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
was an opposite eastern neighbour of Old Slaughter's
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 0.70 pass — The passage states that Roubiliac 'was an opposite eastern neighbour of Old Slaughter's,' which directly supports the claim. The only minor difference is the addition of the word 'opposite' in the passage, but this does not contradict the core claim and the essential information is fully supported.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is highly faithful to the passage. The quote is verbatim and accurately appears in the passage. The viewpoint is correctly identified as 'author' since the passage itself, not a named source, presents this information. The stance of 'asserts' and sentiment of 'neutral' are appropriate. The time qualifiers (null values) are correct as the passage provides no temporal information. However, there is a minor issue: the passage states Roubiliac was 'an opposite eastern neighbour' but the claim simplifies this to 'was eastern neighbour of,' potentially losing the nuance of 'opposite.' This is a very minor semantic simplification that does not substantially misrepresent the passage's meaning, so the score remains high.
Sir Edward Walpole promised to patronize Roubiliac
assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
Sir Edward, to remunerate his integrity, and his skill, of which he showed specimens, promised to patronize Roubiliac through life
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly states that 'Sir Edward, to remunerate his integrity, and his skill, of which he showed specimens, promised to patronize Roubiliac through life,' which directly supports the subject-predicate-object relationship of Sir Edward Walpole promising to patronize Roubiliac.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The quote is accurate and verbatim. The viewpoint is correctly identified as the author's assertion (not attributed to J.T. Smith or a named source in this specific sentence). The stance 'asserts' and sentiment 'neutral' are appropriate. However, there is a minor issue: the time qualifier shows 'when: null', but the passage provides temporal context through 'through life,' which indicates a duration or commitment period. The claim could have captured this in 'valid_from' or by noting the temporal scope 'through life' is mentioned. This is a very minor qualifier fidelity issue since 'when' being null is technically acceptable when no specific date is given, and 'through life' is more a description of duration than a specific time. All other qualifiers are faithful.
Ware was very intimate with Roubiliac
assertspositivesource: coffee-pg28500
He was very intimate with Roubiliac
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage with an exact quote: 'He was very intimate with Roubiliac'. The passage explicitly asserts this relationship between Ware and Roubiliac without any qualification or ambiguity.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage narrator states this as fact, not as a named source attribution). The stance is 'asserts' which is appropriate for a direct factual statement. The sentiment 'positive' matches the connotation of 'very intimate.' The time is correctly null since the passage provides no specific temporal scope. The context is empty as appropriate. The quote 'He was very intimate with Roubiliac' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.

J.T. Smith

Roubiliac found and returned to sir edward walpole the pocket-book
assertspositivesource: coffee-pg28500
finding and returning to the baronet the pocket-book of bank-notes which the young maker of monuments had picked up in Vauxhall Gardens
judge verdicts (4)
- groundedness 0.70 pass — The claim is substantially supported by the passage, which states that Roubiliac found and returned to Sir Edward Walpole a pocket-book of bank-notes at Vauxhall Gardens. The predicate 'found and returned to' is a minor rewording of the passage's phrasing 'finding and returning to,' making it directly supported with only stylistic variation.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.60 fail — VIEWPOINT is unfaithful: the claim attributes the statement to 'author' but the passage explicitly attributes it to J.T. Smith as the source (introduced by 'says J.T. Smith'). The viewpoint should be 'J.T. Smith' not 'author'. Additionally, the QUOTE has an issue: while the quoted text appears in the passage, it describes what Roubiliac 'had picked up' (the action), not what he 'found and returned to' (the predicate). The quote supports the action of finding/returning but the subject-predicate-object structure reverses the relationship - Roubiliac found/returned the pocket-book TO Sir Edward Walpole, not TO the author. The object should be 'the pocket-book' or the relationship should clarify Walpole received it from Roubiliac.
- groundedness 0.70 pass — The claim is substantially supported by the passage. The text states that Roubiliac found and returned to Sir Edward Walpole 'the pocket-book of bank-notes which the young maker of monuments had picked up in Vauxhall Gardens.' The phrasing in the claim reverses the word order slightly ('found and returned to sir edward walpole' vs. 'returning to the baronet the pocket-book'), but the essential fact remains accurately conveyed.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The viewpoint, stance, sentiment, time qualifiers, and context are all accurate. The quote is verbatim and supports the claim. Minor note: The passage attributes this story to J.T. Smith as the source who reports it ("probably before he gained the patronage"), which the claim correctly identifies. One small consideration: the passage says Roubiliac "found and returned" the pocket-book "to the baronet" (Sir Edward Walpole), and the claim accurately reflects this. All qualifiers are faithful to the passage.

narrator

Sir Edward Walpole faithfully performed promise to patronize Roubiliac
assertspositivesource: coffee-pg28500
he faithfully performed this promise
judge verdicts (4)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly says 'Sir Edward, to remunerate his integrity, and his skill, of which he showed specimens, promised to patronize Roubiliac through life, and he faithfully performed this promise.' The subject, predicate, and object are all directly supported without requiring outside knowledge.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.60 fail — The viewpoint qualifier is incorrect. The passage attributes this statement to the author/narrator ('he faithfully performed this promise' is a direct assertion by the text), not to a named source like J.T. Smith. The viewpoint should be null or 'narrator' rather than 'author'. Additionally, the quote 'he faithfully performed this promise' is accurate and appears verbatim, supporting the claim. The stance, sentiment, time qualifiers, and context are appropriate. The primary issue is the misattribution of viewpoint.
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly says 'Sir Edward, to remunerate his integrity, and his skill, of which he showed specimens, promised to patronize Roubiliac through life, and he faithfully performed this promise.' This directly supports all elements of the claim.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The quote is verbatim and accurately reflects the passage's attribution of the promise-fulfillment to Sir Edward Walpole regarding Roubiliac. However, there is one minor issue: the viewpoint is listed as 'narrator' when the passage actually attributes this claim to J.T. Smith's broader historical account (though the specific sentence about faithfully performing the promise appears to be the passage author's narration, not Smith's direct quote). The stance, sentiment (positive), time (null, as no specific date is given), and context (empty, appropriate as none is specified) are all appropriate and faithful to the passage.

Change over time

early life

was often found at Slaughter's