idchkg
An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

shipping board unspecified sense

organization · 3 mentions

the U.S. shipping board responsible for vessel allocation

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

William H. Ukers (author)

  • shipping board accepted and carried out figure of 1,500,000 bags
    assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
    this figure was ultimately accepted and carried out by the shipping board
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage's final sentence: 'this figure was ultimately accepted and carried out by the shipping board.' The subject, predicate, and object all match the text without any rewording or interpretation needed.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage is narrated from an authorial perspective). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage states this as fact. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's straightforward reporting. Time qualifiers are null as the passage does not specify a precise date for when the shipping board accepted this figure. Context is empty as none is needed. The quote appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.

shipping board backed by experts

  • shipping board decided coffee was not a food product and no vessels could be had for its transportation coffee early in 1918 ⟨early in 1918⟩
    assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
    the shipping board, backed by experts, decided, or attempted to decide, that coffee was not a food product; that no vessels could be had for its transportation
    judge verdicts (4)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage, which explicitly states that 'the shipping board, backed by experts, decided, or attempted to decide, that coffee was not a food product; that no vessels could be had for its transportation' early in 1918. The quoted phrase matches the passage text exactly.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.50 fail — The viewpoint qualifier is unfaithful. The passage states the shipping board 'decided, or attempted to decide' this position, but it does not attribute the decision as coming from the shipping board's own assertion or perspective. The passage frames this as an action taken by 'the shipping board, backed by experts' - not as the shipping board itself being the viewpoint source. The claim's viewpoint should be 'experts' or 'shipping board with experts' rather than just 'shipping board' as a perspective. Additionally, the stance should be 'disputes' or reflect that this was a contested position (since Hoover immediately insisted against it), not neutral assertion. The quote is verbatim and the time qualifier is faithful to 'early in 1918', but these do not overcome the perspective and stance issues.
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly says the shipping board 'decided, or attempted to decide, that coffee was not a food product; that no vessels could be had for its transportation' early in 1918, backed by experts.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — The claim is mostly faithful to the passage. The viewpoint, stance, sentiment, time, and quote are all accurate and well-supported. However, there is a minor issue with the 'context' field: it is set to 'early in 1918' which duplicates the temporal information already in the 'time' field. The context should be empty or null since the passage does not restrict the claim to a specific sense, role, or period beyond the temporal scope. All other qualifiers are faithful to the passage, including the accurate quote that appears verbatim and the proper attribution to the shipping board backed by experts.

Change over time

early in 1918
  • decided coffee was not a food product and no vessels could be had for its transportation coffee