shop of Ebenezer Lowell in King Street unspecified sense

William H. Ukers (author)

• coffee could be had at shop of Ebenezer Lowell in King Street 1748
  assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500

  Coffee was also to be had in that year at the shop of Ebenezer Lowell in King Street

  judge verdicts (2)

  • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'Coffee was also to be had in that year at the shop of Ebenezer Lowell in King Street.' The year referenced is 1748, and all elements of the subject-predicate-object relationship are explicitly supported.
  • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage itself makes this statement, not a named source). The stance is 'asserts' which matches the factual tone. Sentiment is neutral, appropriate for a historical statement. The time is 1748, matching 'in that year' which refers to 1748 mentioned in the previous sentence. The context is appropriately empty since the passage does not restrict this to a particular sense. The quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim.