An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

skill unspecified sense

concept · 1 mention

Connections

The concepts, people, and places this entity is most linked to by claims — node size is mention count, colour is type, dashed nodes are other senses of the same word.

skillroasting coffee — 1 shared claimroasting — 1 shared claimphysicians — 1 shared claimroasting coffeeroastingphysicians
Concept

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

William H. Ukers (author)

  • roasting coffee allows improvement skill
    no one so well but that further improvement is possible
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 0.85 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage's closing statement that 'no one so well but that further improvement is possible' regarding coffee roasting. The passage explicitly states that roasting skill can always be improved, making this a well-grounded claim with only minor semantic rewording from the source text.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim's qualifiers are nearly all faithful to the passage. Viewpoint, stance, sentiment, and time are correct. The quote is accurate and verbatim. However, the context field should not be empty - the passage restricts this claim to the specific domain of 'roasting' as work/skill performed by a roasterman, so context should reflect 'roasting work' or similar to maintain full precision about the sense in which improvement is discussed.
  • roasting requires skill ⟨to secure qualities in full degree⟩
    to secure them in their full degree, it is necessary to conduct the process with some skill
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly states 'to secure them in their full degree, it is necessary to conduct the process with some skill,' which directly supports the subject-predicate-object relationship that roasting requires skill.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as the author's own observation, not attributed to a named source). The stance of 'asserts' is appropriate as the passage states this as fact. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's matter-of-fact tone. The time qualifiers are correctly null since the passage provides no temporal scope. The context accurately reflects the passage's restriction of the claim to securing the qualities in full degree. The quote appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.

Hippocrates

  • physicians are nominally many but really few in skill
    according to _Hippocrates_, there are many nominal, but few real Physicians
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The exact quote 'according to _Hippocrates_, there are many nominal, but few real Physicians' appears verbatim, confirming that the passage attributes this assertion to Hippocrates regarding the distinction between nominal and real physicians.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to Hippocrates as the named source (not 'author'). The stance is appropriately marked as 'asserts' since the passage presents this as Hippocrates's statement. The sentiment is neutral, which matches the passage's presentation of this as a factual observation. The time qualifiers are all null, which is correct since the passage provides no temporal scope. The context is empty, which is appropriate since the passage does not restrict the claim to a specific sense or role. The quote appears verbatim in the passage and accurately supports the claim.