An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

steam substance

concept · 6 mentions

steam produced during roasting

Other senses of “steam”

unspecified treatment agent

Connections

The concepts, people, and places this entity is most linked to by claims — node size is mention count, colour is type, dashed nodes are other senses of the same word.

steamsteam (—)steam (treatment agent)pumps — 1 shared claimvacuum pumps — 1 shared claimturbine or reciprocating engines — 1 shared claimwater — 1 shared claimboilers — 1 shared claimpumpsvacuum pumpsturbine or reciproc…waterboilers
Concept

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

George M. Rolph (author)

  • steam drive pumps
    assertsneutralsource: sugar-pg73616
    steam to drive huge pumps
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage's opening sentence: 'The boilers generate steam to drive huge pumps that deliver cold salt water to the condensers throughout the refinery.' The subject, predicate, and object all match the passage without any rewording or generalization required.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (implied narrator of the technical description). The stance is 'asserts' which matches the declarative tone. The sentiment is neutral, reflecting the passage's factual presentation. The time qualifiers are all null, which is appropriate since the passage provides no specific temporal scope. The context is empty, which is correct as the passage does not restrict the meaning to a particular sense or role. The quote 'steam to drive huge pumps' appears verbatim in the passage and accurately supports the claim that steam drives pumps.
  • assertsneutralsource: sugar-pg73616
    steam to drive vacuum pumps
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'The boilers generate steam to drive huge pumps that deliver cold salt water to the condensers throughout the refinery, to drive vacuum pumps that make boiling and evaporation _in vacuo_ possible.' The subject-predicate-object relationship is explicitly supported without rewording needed.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage is a descriptive text without named sources). The stance is assertive, matching the passage's declarative statement about steam driving vacuum pumps. The sentiment is neutral, consistent with the factual, technical tone. Time qualifiers are null, appropriate since the passage provides no temporal scope. Context is empty, correctly reflecting that the passage does not restrict the claim to a particular sense or role of steam. The quote 'steam to drive vacuum pumps' appears verbatim in the passage ('to drive vacuum pumps that make boiling and evaporation in vacuo possible') and directly supports the claim.
  • assertsneutralsource: sugar-pg73616
    steam to drive large turbine or reciprocating engines
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The first sentence explicitly mentions that 'boilers generate steam to drive huge pumps...and to drive large turbine or reciprocating engines that supply the electric power.' The subject, predicate, and object match the passage exactly.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (not a named source). The stance is accurately characterized as 'asserts' - the passage states this as fact. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's objective, technical tone. The time qualifiers are appropriately null, as the passage provides no temporal scope. The context is correctly left empty, as the passage does not restrict the claim to a specific sense or period. The quote 'steam to drive large turbine or reciprocating engines' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.
  • boilers generate steam steam
    assertsneutralsource: sugar-pg73616
    The boilers generate steam
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the opening sentence of the passage: 'The boilers generate steam to drive huge pumps...' This is a straightforward assertion with no rewording or interpretation required.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage itself makes this statement). The stance is appropriately marked as 'asserts' since the passage presents this as a factual statement. The sentiment is neutral, matching the technical, informative tone of the passage. The time qualifiers are correctly set to null since no temporal scope is specified. The context is appropriately empty as no specific sense or role restriction applies. The quote 'The boilers generate steam' appears verbatim at the beginning of the passage and directly supports the claim.

William H. Ukers (author)

  • water turns into steam steam ⟨in the roasting cylinder during quenching⟩
    Usually the water turns to steam
    judge verdicts (4)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'Generally speaking, water is turned into the roasting cylinder to quench the roast. The amount varies with the style of machine, whether gas or coal. Usually the water turns to steam, and the result is not an absorption of the water...' The passage explicitly confirms that water turns into steam in the roasting cylinder.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.60 fail — Multiple qualifier issues: (1) QUOTE MISMATCH - the quoted text does not support the claim. The quote says 'water is turned into the roasting cylinder' (water enters the cylinder), not that 'water turns into steam'. The actual supporting quote should be 'Usually the water turns to steam' from the next sentence. (2) VIEWPOINT - the passage does not attribute this as 'author' assertion; it uses passive voice and general observation language characteristic of technical reporting, but 'author' is acceptable for unattributed general statements. (3) CONTEXT - while 'generally speaking' appears in the passage, it modifies the broader discussion about quenching, not specifically the water-to-steam transformation. The quote provided does not actually state the predicate of the claim.
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly states 'Usually the water turns to steam' when describing the quenching process in the roasting cylinder, matching the subject-predicate-object structure of the claim.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage itself makes this statement, not a named source). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage presents this as fact. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's descriptive tone. The time qualifiers are all null, which is correct since the passage provides no specific temporal scope. The context accurately reflects that this occurs 'in the roasting cylinder during quenching' as stated in the passage. The quote 'Usually the water turns to steam' appears verbatim and directly supports the claim.

Disagreements

drive …