idchkg
An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

stone medical condition

concept · 2 mentions

A medical ailment

Other senses of “stone”

unspecified grinding tool medical

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

Persians, Chinese, Japonese, and Indians

  • tea water expels stone
    assertspositivesource: general-pg53027
    The _Persians_, _Chinese_, _Japonese_, and _Indians_, ascribe uncommon Virtue and Efficacy to this Water, affirming, that it produces the most salutary Effects on the Stomach, Lungs, Liver, Mass of Blood, and all the _Viscera_, which it deterges and corroborates. It also expels the Stone
    judge verdicts (4)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. Olearius explicitly asserts: 'It also expels the Stone, removes the Head-ach, and dissipates that superfluous Humidity, which produces Lassitude and Drowsiness.' The quoted text perfectly matches the claim's assertion.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.50 fail — The quote 'It also expels the Stone' does appear in the passage, but the viewpoint attribution is incorrect. This statement is made by multiple sources collectively (Persians, Chinese, Japonese, and Indians as cited by Olearius), not by Olearius himself asserting it as his own claim. The passage states: 'The _Persians_, _Chinese_, _Japonese_, and _Indians_, ascribe uncommon Virtue and Efficacy to this Water, affirming, that it produces the most salutary Effects...' and 'It also expels the Stone...' Here, Olearius is reporting what these groups affirm, not making his own assertion. The viewpoint should be 'Persians, Chinese, Japonese, and Indians' (as reported by Olearius) or the stance should be 'reports' rather than 'asserts' to indicate Olearius is relaying others' claims.
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The exact quote provided appears verbatim in the Olearius section, stating that the water 'expels the Stone' and attributing this assertion to the Persians, Chinese, Japonese, and Indians as specified in the claim.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly identifies the multiple sources (Persians, Chinese, Japonese, and Indians) rather than attributing to a single author. The stance 'asserts' is appropriate as the passage states these groups 'ascribe uncommon Virtue and Efficacy' and 'affirm' effects. The sentiment is positive, matching the passage's framing. The time qualifiers (all null) are correct as the passage provides no temporal scope. The context is appropriately empty. The quote is verbatim and accurately supports the claim. Minor deduction: the claim slightly compresses the broader attributed effects (stomach, lungs, liver, viscera treatment, etc.) into just 'expels stone,' but this is a valid extraction from the compound statement and does not misrepresent the passage's attribution.

common observation

  • Turkish people are not troubled with the stone stone ⟨in Turkey⟩
    assertspositivesource: coffee-pg28500
    It is observed that in Turkey, where this is generally drunk, that they are not trobled with the Stone
    judge verdicts (4)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly observes that 'in Turkey, where this is generally drunk, that they are not trobled with the Stone' - matching the subject (Turkish people), predicate (are not troubled with), and object (the stone) exactly as presented in the claim.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.50 fail — VIEWPOINT FIDELITY ERROR: The passage explicitly attributes this observation to unspecified observers ("It is observed that..."), not to the author. The claim should reflect this by using 'observer' or 'common observation' as the viewpoint rather than 'author'. Additionally, the quote provided is incomplete and lacks the crucial framing that attributes it to external observation rather than authorial assertion.
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'It is observed that in Turkey, where this is generally drunk, that they are not trobled with the Stone.' The passage explicitly asserts that Turkish people are not troubled with the stone, matching the claim exactly with only minor spelling differences (trobled vs troubled).
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. However, the viewpoint qualifier should be "observed" or "commonly observed" rather than "common observation" to more precisely match the passage's phrasing "It is observed that...". The stance "asserts" is appropriate since the passage presents this as a statement of fact based on observation. The sentiment is correctly positive. The time qualifiers are correctly null since the passage provides no temporal scope. The context "in Turkey" accurately reflects the passage's restriction. The quote is verbatim and supports the claim. Minor adjustment needed only in the precise wording of the viewpoint qualifier.