Simon Paulli (author)
It was formerly customary to sprinkle _Sublimate_ into the Wounds
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'It was formerly customary to sprinkle _Sublimate_ into the Wounds thus inflicted.' The subject (sublimate), predicate (be sprinkled into wounds), object (wounds), and temporal context (formerly) all match the passage exactly without any additions or over-generalization.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as historical fact without attribution to a named source). The stance 'asserts' is appropriate as the passage states this as fact. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's matter-of-fact tone. The time qualifier 'formerly' accurately reflects the passage's temporal framing ('It was formerly customary'). The context 'formerly customary' correctly captures the restrictive scope. The quote is verbatim and directly supports the claim about sublimate being sprinkled into wounds.
