William H. Ukers (author)
supply passed demand
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The exact phrase 'supply passed demand' appears verbatim in the final paragraph, clearly asserting that coffee supply exceeded demand during the period described.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as authorial analysis, not attributed to a named source). The stance 'asserts' is appropriate as the passage states this as fact. The sentiment 'negative' is faithful—the passage frames this supply-demand reversal as part of a problematic sequence leading to price collapse and financial crisis. The time qualifiers are correctly null, as the passage does not specify when this occurred (it mentions 'And then' but gives no specific date). The context is appropriately empty as the claim refers to coffee generically without needing sense or role restriction. The quote 'supply passed demand' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.