An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

tea-plant plant

concept · 2 mentions

A plant native to southern China, known in Chinese botany and medicine from early times

Connections

The concepts, people, and places this entity is most linked to by claims — node size is mention count, colour is type, dashed nodes are other senses of the same word.

tea-plantwith varieties — 1 shared claimChina — 1 shared claimCathaya — 1 shared claimsouthern China — 1 shared claimChinese botany and medicine — 1 shared claimfatigue — 1 shared claimsoul — 1 shared claimwill — 1 shared claimeyesight — 1 shared claimrheumatic pains — 1 shared claimSamuel Johnson — 1 shared claimwith varietiesChinaCathayasouthern ChinaChinese botany and …fatiguesoulwilleyesightrheumatic painsSamuel Johnson
ConceptPersonPlace

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

Kakuzo Okakura (author)

  • The tea-plant, a native of southern China
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the opening sentence of the passage: 'The tea-plant, a native of southern China.' The subject, predicate, and object match the passage exactly without any rewording needed.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as factual statement without attribution to a named source). The stance of 'asserts' matches the declarative nature of the passage. The sentiment is appropriately neutral. The time qualifiers are correctly set to null as the passage provides no specific temporal scope for this claim. The context is empty as appropriate since the passage does not restrict this to a particular sense or role. The quote is verbatim and directly supports the claim.
  • tea-plant was known to Chinese botany and medicine very early times
    was known from very early times to Chinese botany and medicine
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'The tea-plant, a native of southern China, was known from very early times to Chinese botany and medicine.' The subject, predicate, object, and temporal qualifier all match the source text precisely without rewording or outside knowledge.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage itself makes this assertion, not a named source). The stance of 'asserts' appropriately matches the passage's declarative framing. The sentiment is neutral, reflecting the passage's objective tone. The temporal qualifier 'very early times' correctly matches the passage's phrasing with null dates (no specific dates provided). The context is empty, which is appropriate since the passage does not restrict this claim to a particular sense or role—it refers to the tea-plant generally in its botanical and medicinal aspects. The quote is verbatim and directly supports the claim.
  • tea-plant relieves fatigue ⟨medicinal virtue⟩
    possessing the virtues of relieving fatigue
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly mentions that the tea-plant was 'highly prized for possessing the virtues of relieving fatigue,' which directly supports the subject-predicate-object relationship claimed.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is highly faithful overall. The quote matches verbatim and the context 'medicinal virtue' appropriately reflects the passage's presentation of tea-plant as a medicine. The time qualifiers (null values) are correct as the passage provides no specific temporal scope. However, the viewpoint should be 'passage' or 'classical source' rather than 'author' - the passage attributes this knowledge to early Chinese botany and medicine, not to the passage's author as a primary source making an assertion. The stance and sentiment are correct.
  • tea-plant strengthens will ⟨medicinal virtue⟩
    strengthening the will
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage, which explicitly states that the tea-plant was 'highly prized for possessing the virtues of relieving fatigue, delighting the soul, strengthening the will, and repairing the eyesight.' The predicate and object match the passage verbatim.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. All qualifiers are correct except for one issue: the viewpoint should be "Chinese botany and medicine" or "Chinese" rather than "author". The passage attributes this knowledge and belief to Chinese sources (botany, medicine, classics), not to the passage's author making independent assertions. The stance (asserts), sentiment (positive), time (null), context (medicinal virtue), and quote (verbatim and supporting) are all faithful.
  • tea-plant repairs eyesight ⟨medicinal virtue⟩
    repairing the eyesight
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage, which explicitly states that the tea-plant was 'highly prized for possessing the virtues of relieving fatigue, delighting the soul, strengthening the will, and repairing the eyesight.' The predicate and object match the passage verbatim.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The viewpoint should be attributed to "Chinese botany and medicine" or "Chinese sources" rather than "author" - the passage explicitly states these virtues were known to Chinese botany and medicine, not that the author is asserting them independently. The stance, sentiment, time, context, and quote are all accurate and faithful to the passage.
  • tea-plant is applied externally as paste to alleviate rheumatic pains ⟨medicinal use⟩
    often applied externally in form of paste to alleviate rheumatic pains
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'It was not only administered as an internal dose, but often applied externally in form of paste to alleviate rheumatic pains.' The subject, predicate, and object all match the source text without requiring outside knowledge or over-generalization.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to 'author' rather than a named source (the passage itself makes this statement). The stance 'asserts' is appropriate as the passage presents this as factual information. The sentiment 'positive' matches the passage's framing of the tea-plant's therapeutic benefits. The time qualifiers are correctly all null, as the passage provides no specific temporal information. The context 'medicinal use' appropriately captures the passage's restriction of this claim to therapeutic application. The quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim.

Chinese

  • tea plant grows in Cathaya
    the _Cha_, or _Thee_, grew in _China_ and _Cathaya_
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. Gulielmus Leyl explicitly reports being informed by the Chinese that 'the _Cha_, or _Thee_, grew in _China_ and _Cathaya_', making this a fully supported claim from the source material.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The viewpoint, stance, and sentiment are correct - the passage attributes this information to the Chinese (as told to Gulielmus Leyl), and it is asserted neutrally. The time qualifiers are appropriately null. However, there is a minor issue with the quote: the passage states the Cha 'grew in _China_ and _Cathaya_; but that the best came from _Cathaya_' - the quote provided omits the second part about the best coming from Cathaya, which provides important context that Cathaya is presented as superior. The context field is empty which is acceptable, though one could argue it should specify 'the plant' to distinguish from 'tea' as a beverage elsewhere in the passage. The core qualifier fidelity is sound, with only the incomplete quote being a limitation.

Chinese botany and medicine

  • tea-plant has virtue of delighting soul ⟨medicinal virtue⟩
    delighting the soul
    judge verdicts (4)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage, which explicitly states that the tea-plant was 'highly prized for possessing the virtues of relieving fatigue, delighting the soul, strengthening the will, and repairing the eyesight.' The predicate 'delights' and object 'soul' are directly taken from the source text.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.60 fail — The viewpoint qualifier is unfaithful. The passage attributes this claim to 'Chinese botany and medicine' as the source (stating the tea-plant 'was highly prized for possessing the virtues of...delighting the soul'). The claim should use 'Chinese botany and medicine' or a similar source attribution, not 'author'. The quote is accurate and the other qualifiers (stance, sentiment, time, context) are faithful.
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage, which explicitly lists 'delighting the soul' as one of the virtues attributed to the tea-plant in Chinese botany and medicine. The exact phrase appears verbatim in the text describing the plant's prized properties.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.80 pass — The claim is mostly faithful to the passage. The quote 'delighting the soul' appears verbatim and supports the predicate. Sentiment is correctly marked as positive. However, the viewpoint qualifier is slightly imprecise: the passage attributes this knowledge to 'Chinese botany and medicine' collectively, but more accurately the passage states the tea-plant 'was known from very early times to Chinese botany and medicine' and that it 'was highly prized for possessing' these virtues - without specifying whether this valuation comes distinctly from botany, medicine, or both domains. The viewpoint should either be more specific (e.g., 'Chinese medicine' if that's the primary source) or simply 'Chinese sources' or 'ancient Chinese knowledge' to be fully faithful. The time qualifiers are correctly set to null since the passage provides no specific dates. Context 'medicinal virtue' is appropriate. All other qualifiers (stance, sentiment, quote) are faithful.

Frederick B. Goddard (author)

  • tea plant has one species with varieties
    There is but one species of the tea plant and its varieties are due to differences of soil and climate
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage with the exact quote provided: 'There is but one species of the tea plant and its varieties are due to differences of soil and climate.' This statement is fully supported without any rewording or interpretation needed.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as the author's assertion, not attributed to a named source). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' - the passage states this as fact without dispute or questioning. The sentiment is neutral, matching the factual tone of the botanical statement. The time qualifiers are correctly null since the passage provides no temporal scope. The context is empty as appropriate since the passage discusses the tea plant without restricting it to a specific sense or role. The quote appears verbatim and directly supports the claim about the single species and varieties caused by soil and climate differences.

Gulielmus Leyl

  • tea plant grows in China
    the _Cha_, or _Thee_, grew in _China_
    judge verdicts (4)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. Gulielmus Leyl explicitly reports being 'informed by the Chinese' that 'the Cha, or Thee, grew in China and Cathaya,' making this a fully supported assertion about where the tea plant grows according to Chinese sources.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.60 fail — VIEWPOINT FIDELITY ERROR: The claim attributes this to 'Chinese' as viewpoint, but the passage explicitly states the information came from 'Gulielmus Leyl' (a Dane returning from the East Indies) who was 'informed by the Chinese.' The viewpoint should be 'Gulielmus Leyl' as the named source who received and reported this information, not 'Chinese' as the direct viewpoint. The passage uses Leyl as the authoritative narrator of what the Chinese told him.
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. Gulielmus Leyl explicitly reports being informed by the Chinese that 'the Cha, or Thee, grew in China and Cathaya,' making this a fully supported assertion without rewording or over-generalization.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. Viewpoint is correctly attributed to Gulielmus Leyl as the source of the information. Stance is appropriately marked as 'asserts' since the passage presents this as a factual claim. Sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's tone. Time qualifiers are correctly set to null as the passage provides no specific temporal scope. Context is empty, which is appropriate as the passage does not restrict the claim to a particular sense or period. The quote appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.

Samuel Johnson

  • Samuel Johnson diluted his meals with infusion of tea plant for twenty years tea plant twenty years
    for twenty years diluted his meals with only the infusion of the fascinating plant
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage through a direct quote from Samuel Johnson's own portrait, where he explicitly describes himself as 'a hardened and shameless tea drinker, who for twenty years diluted his meals with only the infusion of the fascinating plant.' The phrasing matches the source material precisely.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly attributes the statement to Samuel Johnson, the stance is appropriate as 'asserts', and the time qualifier 'twenty years' matches the passage. However, the sentiment should be 'positive' rather than 'neutral' - the passage characterizes Johnson as a 'hardened and shameless tea drinker' with language emphasizing fascination and pleasure ('amused', 'solaced', 'welcomed'), which carries positive connotation. The quote is verbatim and supports the claim. The context is appropriately empty as the passage does not restrict this to a specific sense or role of tea.

Change over time

twenty years
  • diluted his meals with infusion of tea plant for twenty years Samuel Johnson
very early times
  • was known to Chinese botany and medicine

Disagreements

grows in …