An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

Thomas Byerly unspecified sense

person · 4 mentions

The actual person behind the pseudonym Reuben Percy

Connections

The concepts, people, and places this entity is most linked to by claims — node size is mention count, colour is type, dashed nodes are other senses of the same word.

Thomas ByerlyReuben Percy — 2 shared claims1824 — 1 shared claimSir John Byerley — 1 shared claimMirror — 1 shared claimStar — 1 shared claimReuben Percy1824Sir John ByerleyMirrorStar
ConceptPersonWork

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

William H. Ukers (author)

  • Thomas Byerly died in 1824 1824
    who died in 1824
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'Reuben Percy was Thomas Byerly, who died in 1824.' The subject, predicate, and object are all explicitly mentioned without any rewording or inference required.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The quote appears verbatim and accurately states that Thomas Byerly died in 1824. However, the viewpoint qualifier should be 'passage' or 'author of passage' rather than 'author' - the passage presents this as a factual statement from the text itself, not attributed to a specific named source. All other qualifiers (stance, sentiment, time, context) are appropriate. Minor deduction for the imprecise viewpoint terminology.
  • he was the brother of Sir John Byerley
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'Reuben Percy was Thomas Byerly, who died in 1824; he was the brother of Sir John Byerley.' This explicitly confirms that Thomas Byerly was the brother of Sir John Byerley.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author/passage narrator rather than a named source. The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage states this as fact. Sentiment is neutral, matching the factual tone of the passage. Time qualifiers are correctly set to null as the passage provides no temporal scope for this relationship. Context is appropriately empty as no restrictive context is provided. The quote appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.
  • Thomas Byerly assistant editor of Star
    and Mr. Byerley assistant editor
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly mentions 'Mr. Byerley assistant editor' in the context of the Star newspaper, where Dr. Tilloch was the editor.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. However, there is a minor issue with the viewpoint qualifier: the passage attributes the statement about Byerley being assistant editor to the implicit narrator/author of the passage itself, not to a named external source. The claim correctly uses "author" as the viewpoint rather than attributing it to a specific named source, which is appropriate. All other qualifiers are faithful: stance is 'asserts' (appropriate for a factual statement), sentiment is neutral, time is null (the passage provides no specific temporal scope for this role), context is empty (appropriate as the passage does not restrict this to a particular sense or period), and the quote is verbatim and supports the claim. The only minor consideration is whether the quote should be slightly longer for full context ("and Mr. Byerley assistant editor; and to the latter overhearing the suggestion"), but the quoted portion is accurate and supports the main claim.
  • Reuben Percy was Thomas Byerly
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The passage directly states 'Reuben Percy was Thomas Byerly, who died in 1824,' making this claim fully supported by the text without requiring any outside knowledge or generalization.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author of the passage (not a named source), the stance is appropriately 'asserts' for a factual statement, sentiment is neutral, time qualifiers are correctly null (no temporal scope given for this identity claim), context is empty (the passage provides no specific context restriction), and the quote appears verbatim in the passage supporting the claim.

narrator

  • Reuben Percy was a pseudonym for Thomas Byerly
    Reuben Percy was Thomas Byerly
    judge verdicts (4)
    • groundedness 0.70 pass — The passage directly states that the names (Sholto Percy and Reuben Percy) were assumed or fictional ('the names and the locality were _suppose_'), and then reveals their real identities as Thomas Byerly and Joseph Clinton Robertson. The claim that these were pseudonymous names is fully supported by the text with only minor wording variation from the original '_suppose_' phrasing.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.50 fail — VIEWPOINT: The claim attributes the assertion to 'author' but the passage does not name an author making this statement. The passage itself, as narrator/historian, presents this information. The viewpoint should reflect the passage as the source, not 'author'. QUOTE: The provided quote 'the names and the locality were _suppose_' does not directly support that the names were pseudonymous - it only says the names (and locality) were 'suppose' (supposed/false), which is consistent with pseudonymity but the actual identities (Reuben Percy = Thomas Byerly, Sholto Percy = Joseph Clinton Robertson) are stated separately in subsequent sentences. A more appropriate quote would be one explicitly linking the fictional names to the real persons.
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'Reuben Percy was Thomas Byerly, who died in 1824.' This is an explicit identification of the pseudonym with the real person.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly identified as 'narrator' (the passage presents this as historical fact, not attributed to a named source). The stance 'asserts' accurately reflects how the passage states this information. The sentiment 'neutral' matches the passage's straightforward, informative tone. The time qualifiers are correctly set to null since the passage provides no temporal restriction on this identity claim. The context is appropriately empty as no specific context limitation applies. The quote 'Reuben Percy was Thomas Byerly' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.

passage

  • Thomas Byerly first editor of Mirror commenced by John Limbird, in 1822
    he was the first editor of the _Mirror_, commenced by John Limbird, in 1822
    judge verdicts (4)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'Reuben Percy was Thomas Byerly, who died in 1824; he was the brother of Sir John Byerley, and the first editor of the _Mirror_, commenced by John Limbird, in 1822.' The subject, predicate, object, and temporal context all match exactly.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.50 fail — VIEWPOINT: The claim uses "author" as the perspective, but the passage does not attribute this statement to a named source - it is presented as direct historical fact by the passage itself. The viewpoint should be "passage" or "text", not "author". All other qualifiers (stance, sentiment, time, context, quote) are faithful to the passage. The quote appears verbatim and the temporal information correctly reflects that the Mirror was commenced in 1822.
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'Reuben Percy was Thomas Byerly, who died in 1824; he was the brother of Sir John Byerley, and the first editor of the _Mirror_, commenced by John Limbird, in 1822.' This fully supports the subject-predicate-object relationship with the specified time context.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the passage itself. The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage states this as fact. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's informational tone. The time qualifier correctly identifies 1822 as the valid_from date when the Mirror was commenced, with null for valid_to as the passage provides no end date. The context is appropriately empty as the passage provides no specific contextual restriction. The quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim about Thomas Byerly being the first editor of the Mirror.

Change over time

commenced by John Limbird, in 1822
  • first editor of Mirror
1824
  • died in 1824