William H. Ukers (author)
What first made coffee-houses suspicious to those in authority
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage's opening sentence: 'What first made coffee-houses suspicious to those in authority, however, is their true resource--the advantages they offer for meeting one's kind, for social converse and the contemplation of life.' The passage explicitly asserts that coffee-houses were made suspicious to authorities.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (narrator of the text), the stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage presents this as a statement of fact, sentiment is neutral as the passage discusses the matter objectively, time qualifiers are correctly null as no specific temporal scope is given, context is appropriately empty as the passage treats coffee-houses generally without restricting to a particular sense or period, and the quote appears verbatim and directly supports the claim about what made coffee-houses suspicious to authorities.
