idchkg
An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

three arbitrators unspecified sense

concept · 1 mention

Connections

The concepts, people, and places this entity is most linked to by claims — node size is mention count, colour is type, dashed nodes are other senses of the same word.

three arbitratorssubmitted samples — 1 shared claimrange of submitted grades — 1 shared claimsuperintendent — 1 shared claimsubmitted samplesrange of submitted …superintendent
ConceptPerson

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

William H. Ukers (author)

  • three arbitrators decide on basis of submitted samples
    assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
    who decide on the basis of the samples submitted
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'The superintendent selects by lot three of these arbitrators, who decide on the basis of the samples submitted.' The subject, predicate, and object are all explicitly mentioned with no rewording needed.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage itself narrates this procedural rule without attribution to a named source). The stance 'asserts' is appropriate as the passage states this as fact. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's procedural tone. Time qualifiers are appropriately null as the passage provides no temporal scope. Context is empty as the passage does not restrict this claim to a particular sense or role. The quote 'who decide on the basis of the samples submitted' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.
  • three arbitrators will not lower grade below or raise above range of submitted grades
    assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
    will not make a decision lowering the grade below that of the lowest submitted nor higher than the highest
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The exact quote provided matches the passage verbatim, confirming that the three arbitrators selected by lot will not make a decision lowering the grade below the lowest submitted nor higher than the highest submitted.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage itself describes the rules). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage states this as a rule without dispute. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's matter-of-fact tone. Time qualifiers are correctly null as the passage provides no specific temporal scope for this rule. Context is appropriately empty as the passage does not restrict this to a particular sense or role. The quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim about the three arbitrators' decision-making constraints.
  • superintendent selects by lot three arbitrators
    assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
    The superintendent selects by lot three of these arbitrators
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — This claim is directly stated in the passage with the exact wording: 'The superintendent selects by lot three of these arbitrators.' The subject, predicate, and object are all explicitly mentioned without any rewording needed.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage itself states this as fact, not attributing it to a named source). The stance is correctly marked as 'asserts' - the passage presents this as a procedural rule without dispute or questioning. The sentiment is appropriately neutral. The time qualifiers are correctly null since the passage provides no specific temporal scope. The context is appropriately empty as no sense or role restriction is needed. The quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim.