Trigg unspecified sense

William H. Ukers (author)

• Trigg discussed boiling boiling
  assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500

  Discussed (Trigg), 720

  judge verdicts (2)

  • groundedness 1.00 pass — The passage directly states under the 'Boiling' entry: 'Discussed (Trigg), 720', which explicitly confirms that Trigg discussed boiling. This is a direct match with no ambiguity or over-generalization.
  • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly attributes the discussion to Trigg (not 'author'). The stance 'asserts' is appropriate for a factual attribution. Sentiment 'neutral' matches the objective tone. Time is correctly null as the passage provides no temporal information. Context is appropriately empty as none is specified. The quote 'Discussed (Trigg), 720' appears verbatim in the passage under the 'Boiling' entry and accurately supports the claim that Trigg discussed boiling.
• percolation discussed by Trigg
  assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500

  Discussed (Trigg)

  judge verdicts (2)

  • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The index entry 'Percolation' explicitly lists 'Discussed (Trigg), 720, 721', confirming that Trigg discussed percolation.
  • qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — Viewpoint is incorrect: the passage shows 'Discussed (Trigg)' which attributes the discussion to Trigg as a source, so the viewpoint should be 'Trigg' not 'author'. All other qualifiers (stance, sentiment, time, context, quote) are faithful to the passage.