Tupholme machine unspecified sense

work · 4 mentions

Direct-flame gas coffee roaster patented in England and the United States

Connections

The concepts, people, and places this entity is most linked to by claims — node size is mention count, colour is type, dashed nodes are other senses of the same word.

Concept

Defining properties

was patented in england in 1887
was patented in united states in 1896-97
embodies improvements on direct-flame gas coffee roasting machine

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

William H. Ukers (author)

Tupholme machine was patented in england in 1887 1887
assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
This was Tupholme's machine, patented in England in 1887
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'This was Tupholme's machine, patented in England in 1887.' The subject, predicate, and object are all explicitly mentioned with no rewording needed.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage itself states the fact without attribution to a named source). The stance is 'asserts' which matches the passage's presentational mode. The sentiment is neutral, appropriate for a factual statement. The time qualifier correctly specifies 1887 as both when and valid_from with null valid_to, matching the passage's temporal scope. The context is empty, which is appropriate as the passage does not restrict this to a particular sense or role. The quote appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.
Tupholme machine was patented in united states in 1896-97 1896-97
assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
and in the United States in 1896-97
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'This was Tupholme's machine, patented in England in 1887, and in the United States in 1896-97.' The subject, predicate, and object are all explicitly mentioned with no rewording needed.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (not a named source). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as a factual statement. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's objective tone. The time qualifiers (when, valid_from, valid_to) accurately reflect the 1896-97 timeframe stated in the passage. The context is appropriately empty as the passage provides no contextual restrictions. The quote appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim about the Tupholme machine's U.S. patent date.

Ellis M. Potter

direct-flame gas coffee roasting machine embodies improvements on Tupholme machine 1899
assertspositivesource: coffee-pg28500
certain improvements on the Tupholme machine
judge verdicts (4)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The 1899 entry explicitly states that Ellis M. Potter's direct-flame gas coffee roasting machine embodies 'certain improvements on the Tupholme machine,' matching the subject, predicate, and object of the claim exactly.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.50 fail — The viewpoint should be 'Ellis M. Potter' (the named source who invented/patented the machine), not 'author'. The passage explicitly attributes this statement to Potter's patent, not to the author as a general claim. Additionally, the time qualifier is problematic: the passage states this occurred in 1899 when the patent was granted, so 'when' should be '1899' (correct), but the passage does not provide 'valid_from' and 'valid_to' dates - these should both be null or omitted since the passage only specifies the patent grant date, not a validity period. The quote is accurate and the sentiment appears appropriate, but the viewpoint attribution is the critical error here.
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The 1899 entry explicitly states that Ellis M. Potter's direct-flame gas coffee roasting machine embodies 'certain improvements on the Tupholme machine,' with details about how the gas flame is spread to avoid scorching and secure uniform roasting.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is nearly faithful to the passage. The subject, predicate, object, viewpoint (Ellis M. Potter), stance (asserts), and quote are all accurate and properly attributed. The quote 'certain improvements on the Tupholme machine' appears verbatim in the passage. The sentiment 'positive' is appropriate given the passage frames these as improvements. However, there is a minor issue with the time qualifier: the passage explicitly states this occurred in 1899 when 'Ellis M. Potter, New York, is granted a United States patent,' so the time is correct. The context field is appropriately empty as the passage provides no additional contextual restriction beyond the direct-flame gas coffee roasting machine itself. All qualifiers are faithful to the passage.

Change over time

1887

was patented in england in 1887

1896-97

was patented in united states in 1896-97

1899

embodies improvements on direct-flame gas coffee roasting machine