An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

twenty-nine black beans imperfection

concept · 1 mention

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

William H. Ukers (author)

  • coffee sample graded as no. 4 when showing twenty-nine black beans ⟨in one-pound samples⟩
    if twenty-nine black beans, as No. 4
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'If a sample shows six black beans, or equivalent imperfections, it is graded as No. 2; if thirteen black beans, as No. 3; if twenty-nine black beans, as No. 4...' The subject, predicate, and object all match exactly what is written.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint 'author' is appropriate as the passage presents a classification system without attributing it to a named source. The stance 'asserts' correctly reflects the declarative nature of the grading criteria. The sentiment 'neutral' matches the factual, technical tone. The time is correctly null as the passage provides no temporal scope. The context 'in one-pound samples' accurately reflects the passage's specification that 'The test is made on one-pound samples.' The quote 'if twenty-nine black beans, as No. 4' appears verbatim and directly supports the claim about the grading threshold.